Search for: "Los Angeles v. Superior Court" Results 61 - 80 of 1,364
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
 The Los Angeles Superior Court interpreted “provide” to mean “make available,” and, on that basis, concluded that AutoZoners satisfied its requirement to “provide” seating under the Wage Order. [read post]
Over one year before Shaw filed her PAGA complaint, however, another plaintiff, Tatiana Paez, had filed a PAGA complaint in Los Angeles Superior Court against BevMo. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co. (1999) 20 Cal.4th 163, 180 (Cel-Tech).) [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:29 am
” On May 13, 2022, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis issued a ruling in Crest v. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:29 am
” On May 13, 2022, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis issued a ruling in Crest v. [read post]
Padilla I (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. 19STCV27561) (Crest), Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis ruled that California Corporations Code Section 301.3 (SB 826), which requires publicly listed corporations in California to have women on their boards, violates the Equal Protection Clause of California’s Constitution. [read post]
1 Jun 2022, 6:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
Here is the author’s article. *************** On May 13, 2022, a judge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court ruled in Crest v. [read post]
May 13, 2022), the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles (Duffy-Lewis, J.) issued a decision following a bench trial finding that Senate Bill 826 (“SB 826”), California’s law requiring gender diversity on boards of directors, violates the Equal Protection Clause of the California Constitution. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Virginia Milstead
On May 13, 2022, a judge of the Los Angeles County Superior Court ruled in Crest v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 2:25 pm by Ian Michalak
On May 13, 2022, a law requiring publicly held corporations headquartered in California to have women on the board of directors was enjoined from being enforced and declared unconstitutional after a bench trial in Los Angeles Superior Court. [read post]
17 May 2022, 12:15 am
As I noted yesterday, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis has found California's female director quota law, SB 826, to violate the Equal Protection clause of the California Constitution (A person may not be . . . denied equal protection of the law"). [read post]
16 May 2022, 1:28 pm
Following a lengthy trial, Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maureen Duffy-Lewis has found that California's female director quota law violates the Equal Protection Clause of the California Constitution. [read post]
8 May 2022, 6:30 am
In the first test of a state’s board-diversity requirement, a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge has entered summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in Crest v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 6:30 am
In the first test of a state’s board-diversity requirement, a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge has entered summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in Crest v. [read post]