Search for: "Louisiana Power & Light Company v. Federal Power Commission" Results 21 - 40 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Nov 2011, 9:14 am
During the pendency of this litigation, in 2010, the Louisiana Legislature adopted Act 858, amending Section 48:394 in light of the court's decision in Franks Investment Co. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
– EPA News Release, February 25, 2010 A property management company based in Meriden, CT has agreed to pay a $276,000 penalty for violating federal lead-based paint disclosure requirements. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am by John Elwood
Electric Power Supply Association, 14-841, are two linked cases concerning the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s regulation of prices that operators of wholesale-electricity markets pay for reductions in energy consumption. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
  Colombia Colombian trade marks just got a little slower (IP tango)   Croatia Simplified process for renewing customs watch applications, from 1 January 2009 (Class 46)   Europe European Court of Justice rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference: Verein Radetzky-Orden v Bundesvereinigung Kameradschaft ‘Feldmarschall Radetzky’ (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI decides BARBARA BECKER confusingly similar to earlier Community trade mark BECKER… [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:13 pm by Pace Law School Library
Supplying the light at the end of the tunnel: using state-level experience to develop federal-level renewable energy policy. 19 Southeastern Envtl. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
In this article, we begin with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regulations that mandate risk disclosures, and the federal statutes that create civil liability for misleading statements. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Following the 2018 South Dakota v. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
—EPA News Release, December 22, 2009 Duke Energy, one of the largest electric power companies in the nation, will spend approximately $85 million to significantly reduce harmful air pollution at an Indiana power plant and pay a $1.75 million civil penalty, under a settlement to resolve violations of federal clean air laws, the Justice Department and the U.S. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:10 am
Philip Morris is based on the thin argument that, because the cigarette company performed the tests rating the tar and nicotine in "light" cigarettes that are the heart of the plaintiffs' suit, they themselves were acting as "federal officers" since the tests were required by the Federal Trade Commission. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
—EPA News Release, December 22, 2009 Duke Energy, one of the largest electric power companies in the nation, will spend approximately $85 million to significantly reduce harmful air pollution at an Indiana power plant and pay a $1.75 million civil penalty, under a settlement to resolve violations of federal clean air laws, the Justice Department and the U.S. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am by Pace Law School Library
  Reconciliation after Winter:  the standard forpreliminary injunctions in federal courts. [read post]
Not only would the WMA abolish covenants not to compete nationwide, outside of the extremely narrow exceptions highlighted above, but it would also provide the Department of Labor (DOL) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) with broad enforcement power. [read post]
” Specifically, DMWW asserts that the doctrines set forth by the defendants are no longer applicable in light of “modern understanding. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  As we discuss further in Section IV, SB 264 is also the subject of  a constitutional and statutory challenge in the federal courts in the case of Shen v. [read post]