Search for: "Louisiana v. Michael" Results 101 - 120 of 450
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2020, 4:43 am by James Romoser
In an article published by the Federalist Society, Michael Bindas anticipates how yet another recent blockbuster — Espinoza v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:38 am by Phil Dixon
Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), struck down Louisiana’s practice of allowing non-unanimous jury verdicts, pointing to the law’s racist origins (Emily Coward blogged about the decision here). [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
McGarity, Michael C. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
Court-watchers are focusing on Espinoza v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 11:30 pm by Schachtman
The litigation is In re Taxotere (Docetaxel) Products Liability Litigation, a multi-district litigation (MDL) proceeding before Judge Jane Triche Milazzo, who sits on the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” At The Originalism Blog, Michael Ramsey highlights an amicus brief in Fulton v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week, FX premiered AKA Jane Roe, a documentary on the life of Norma McCorvey, the woman who was the plaintiff in Roe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
Michael Semler weighs in on Liu v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
At Subscript Law, Michael Hollingsworth provides a graphic explainer. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 3:40 am by Edith Roberts
At Dorf on Law, Michael Dorf takes issue with Justice Clarence Thomas’ claim, which Thomas reiterated on Monday in his dissent from denial of cert in Baldwin v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 8:00 am by NCC Staff
Russo, and says that accepting the arguments of Louisiana and the U.S. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings: The American nicotine market is developing faster than ever due to introduction of non-combustible recreational nicotine products. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 3:48 am by Edith Roberts
” At Vox (via How Appealing), Ian Millhiser argues that the two cases consolidated under June Medical Services v. [read post]