Search for: "Louisiana v. Price" Results 1 - 20 of 465
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2025, 7:59 am by Eric Goldman
It disrespects, and erases from the equation, the many consumers who benefit from lawyer advertising, especially when comparative advertising expands their options and spurs competition on price and quality. [read post]
  (S.B. 83) District of Columbia In early February 2025, the Consumer Price Index for the Washington D.C. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by Anagha Vasudevarao
Supreme Court ruling in Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) v. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by Ellie Rudnick
Circuit issued a decision in Marin Audubon Society v. [read post]
23 Oct 2024, 12:03 pm by Eric Goldman
This is a major ruling validating the legitimacy of competitive keyword advertising, which occurs when an advertiser purchases and displays ads triggered in response to third-party trademarks. [read post]
Brief Introduction: On July 1, 2024, the Western District of Louisiana ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in the case, State of Louisiana et al. v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 4:36 pm
 Pix Credit here I’ve either been too young to be in the Senate because I wasn’t 30 yet and too old to stay as President. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 12:40 pm by Eric Goldman
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Sep 21, 2023 | HHS Selects Drugs for Medicare Price Negotiation | Biden Administration introduces price regulation to the pharmaceutical industry. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]