Search for: "Louisiana v. Price" Results 281 - 300 of 488
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2013, 7:40 am by Francisco MacĂ­as
I, personally, find Article V particularly interesting. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
Louisiana, 14-280 (second relist since the Court received the state’s brief in opposition); Tolliver v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 10:54 am by Karen Gullo
In that way, online platforms are no different from newspapers or parade organizers.A federal appeals court in Louisiana, ruling last month in the case Netchoice v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The Court has agreed to decide “whether Title VII prohibits discrimination against transgender people based on (1) their status as transgender or (2) sex stereotyping under Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
" in other words, because there are so many participants in national stock markets, and those participants have such a voracious appetite for information, then anything about a particular stock is essentially instantaneously reflected in that stock’s price. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
July 11, 2014) (applying Louisiana law), which we later found out was decided the same day.In one of our earlier posts, less than a week after Conte was decided, we made up an example to illustrate the potentially wide-ranging impact of allowing non-manufacturer liability for products based solely on “foreseeability”:Plaintiff New Dad gives plaintiff New Mom his old SUV, manufactured by Gasguzzlers ‘R Us, so she has something big and safe to drive New Baby around. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:15 am by Eric
Simultaneously, manufacturers are embracing minimum resale prices following the Supreme Court opinion in Leegin. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am by Deborah Heller
The petitioner appealed to the Louisiana Supreme Court, which denied review without providing any reasons for the denial. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:51 am by Peter Mahler
” Georgia: Stock Redemption Agreement’s “Current Value” Pricing Provision Excludes Minority Discount Wallace v Wallace, 813 S.E.2d 428 [Ct. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
In Chicago, for example, car rental customers pay a 5 percent Illinois state car rental tax, a 6 percent excise tax levied by the city’s Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority (MPEA), and another 9 percent personal property lease transaction tax levied by the city of Chicago.[4] State car rental excise taxes are applied either on an ad valorem basis, where the tax applies to a percentage of the sale price, or as a flat dollar amount. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 10:59 am by John Elwood
Louisiana, 14-6381, is another in a long line of petitions involving the retroactivity of the Court’s decision in Miller v. [read post]