Search for: "Louisiana v. Price"
Results 381 - 400
of 495
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2022, 11:25 am
The stock price at the time averaged $22 and hit its all-time peak during this period. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:01 am
In another, a barber and a dry cleaner in Alabama won their right to offer services below a minimum price set in a New Deal-era price-fixing scheme. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
Louisiana ; Trump v. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 8:25 am
EEOC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:35 pm
The Relevance and Admissibility of Rezoning and Comparable Sales Occurring After the Date of Taking, When Determining the Value of Condemned Property by Alan T. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
A couple of decades later, in Jacobson v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
U.S. 2nd Circuit Court of Appeals, September 27, 2007US v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:10 am
The major point of Professor Stone‘s article is that, in the wake of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
Louisiana, 14-280, which the Court granted to resolve that question. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
George v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 9:58 am
Mazza v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
Piacentile v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am
Louisiana, 14-9409, Flowers v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 1:55 am
Four states (Arkansas, Louisiana, Nebraska, and Oklahoma) saw corporate income tax rates decrease. [read post]
24 Dec 2009, 3:28 pm
“This is one more attempt to erase the history of the peoples of the former Soviet Union, including the heroic history, from historical memory,” Prime Minister Vladimir V. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
Risk-based pricing and risk-reducingeffort: does the private insurancemarket reduce environmental accidents? [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 7:43 am
US v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 1:14 pm
In Bigelow v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 1:14 pm
In Bigelow v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm
Outside of this directive, the agencies generally have taken the view that prior enforcement of the antitrust laws was too lax and that the narrow focus on more traditional antitrust harms (such as higher prices, reduced output, or lower quality) has been too narrow. [read post]
