Search for: "Louisiana v. Price" Results 81 - 100 of 488
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2021, 10:05 pm by Jeff Richardson
 Let’s say that you have a case that you previously handled called Smith v Acme and now you have a new case called Jones v Acme. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 9:50 am by Eric Goldman
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Policy responses in recent years have included banning common carrier delivery of cigarettes,[6] greater law enforcement activity on interstate roads,[7] differential tax rates near low-tax jurisdictions,[8] and cracking down on tribal reservations that sell tax-free cigarettes.[9] However, the underlying problem remains: high cigarette taxes amount to a “price prohibition” on the legal product in many U.S. states.[10] International Smuggling and Counterfeiting Puts Consumers… [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:00 am by Charles Sartain
In Bayou Bridge Pipeline v. 38.00 acres nobody had a gun, nobody got taken away, and one side was right and one side was wrong. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 2:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Connecticut’s property tax burdens are rising rapidly, with the state’s effective property tax rates on owner-occupied housing now among the highest in the country at 1.7 percent of housing value. [read post]
  Some may argue that just as a subsidy would allow a renewable resource to bid in a lower capacity price than it otherwise would, so too might a subsidy for a fossil resource. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
” Justice Alito and the other dissenters thought the Court ought not to make Oregon and Louisiana pay such a steep price for their reasonable reliance on the Apodaca precedent.Why Not Non-Retroactivity? [read post]