Search for: "Louisiana v. Price"
Results 81 - 100
of 463
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2021, 10:20 am
v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 9:08 am
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 1:31 pm
Lubin Austermuehle’s track record of defending and prosecuting class-actions includes that the firm obtained a $40 million settlement in the Erikson v. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 11:46 am
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 11:41 am
On prescription, the First Circuit applied a straight-forward reading of the Louisiana Supreme Court’s ruling in Marin v. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 9:17 am
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:45 pm
The Education Department’s announcement comes a year after Bostock v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 2:23 pm
Louisiana v. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 11:44 am
It is one of the few products where a price-based (ad valorem) excise tax is appropriate. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 10:31 am
Then again, from 1-800 Contacts’ perspective, $15M is a small price to pay for the ability to charge supra-competitive prices to consumers for 15+ years. [read post]
18 May 2021, 3:23 am
Teague v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
In Chicago, for example, car rental customers pay a 5 percent Illinois state car rental tax, a 6 percent excise tax levied by the city’s Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority (MPEA), and another 9 percent personal property lease transaction tax levied by the city of Chicago.[4] State car rental excise taxes are applied either on an ad valorem basis, where the tax applies to a percentage of the sale price, or as a flat dollar amount. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 1:32 pm
Of Univ. of Ill. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 6:21 am
See Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 6:21 am
See Louisiana Power & Light Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 9:50 am
BagSpot * Brief Roundup of Three Keyword Advertising Lawsuit Developments * Interesting Tidbits From FTC’s Antitrust Win Against 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Restrictions * 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * FTC Explains Why It Thinks 1-800 Contacts’ Keyword Ad Settlements Were Anti-Competitive–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Amazon Defeats Lawsuit… [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am
Policy responses in recent years have included banning common carrier delivery of cigarettes,[6] greater law enforcement activity on interstate roads,[7] differential tax rates near low-tax jurisdictions,[8] and cracking down on tribal reservations that sell tax-free cigarettes.[9] However, the underlying problem remains: high cigarette taxes amount to a “price prohibition” on the legal product in many U.S. states.[10] International Smuggling and Counterfeiting Puts Consumers… [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 5:00 am
In Bayou Bridge Pipeline v. 38.00 acres nobody had a gun, nobody got taken away, and one side was right and one side was wrong. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:04 am
In Salathe v. [read post]
