Search for: "Louisiana v. Price" Results 121 - 140 of 489
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2019, 11:31 am by Eric Goldman
 Blog post: 1-800 Contacts Charges Higher Prices Than Its Online Competitors, But They Are OK With That–FTC v. 1-800 Contacts * Complaint Counsel’s Corrected Pre-Trial Brief and Exhibits. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 5:45 am by Kevin Kaufman
Note: The author thanks Brittany Moore for contributing to statutory research for this piece. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 8:24 am by Edmund LaCour
Louisiana, he wrote the opinion for a five-justice majority that held that the Eighth Amendment prohibited the death penalty for child rapists, and in the 2012 case Miller v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
After nearly six months of negotiation, a price was agreed upon and the FDS shop foreman executed a contract with UniFirst. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 9:08 am by Steven Cohen
Price, et al – United States District Court – Eastern District of Louisiana – June 13th, 2019) involves an automobile accident between the plaintiff and the defendant. [read post]
27 May 2019, 6:17 am by Richard Hunt
Decided a few weeks after Price v City of Ocala, Price v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 5:44 am by Marci A. Hamilton
The Supreme Court said as much when two important cases are read together: the 1905 decision in Jacobson v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am by Eric Goldman
Citing Thompson v. 1800-Contacts, the court finds antitrust standing among consumers who possibly paid higher prices due to the restrictions on keyword ads: Plaintiff has alleged that Defendants agreed to manipulate paid search results so that when a cons [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 8:43 am by John Elwood
§ 2000e-2(a)(1), meant “gender identity” and included “transgender status” when Congress enacted Title VII in 1964; and (2) whether Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 11:51 am by Peter Mahler
” Georgia: Stock Redemption Agreement’s “Current Value” Pricing Provision Excludes Minority Discount Wallace v Wallace, 813 S.E.2d 428 [Ct. [read post]