Search for: "Louisiana v. Texas" Results 141 - 160 of 1,509
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2015, 9:39 am by Jamie LaPlante
Only employers in Texas, Nebraska, Arkansas, and Louisiana should continue operating under the prior definition of a “spouse” for FMLA purposes. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:26 pm by Liskow & Lewis
  The effect of these clauses in Texas, has always been questionable in light of the Texas Supreme Court’s opinion in Heritage Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 5:34 am by Raymond G. Lahoud
The lawsuit, brought by Texas and Louisiana, not only impacts the future of immigration enforcement in the country but also may impact the right of states to sue the federal government over discretionary policies. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 12:11 pm by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
According to the court’s ruling, the public has an “abiding interest” in protecting state laws from “federal encroachment” (Texas v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:36 pm by WIMS
        Evans Industries, Inc., (Evans) operated a series of five leased facilities in Louisiana and Texas that manufactured, filled, warehoused and distributed steel drums and industrial containers. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:43 am by Madeline Thomas
  While Texas currently has “primacy” (approval from the EPA for permitting and enforcement authority) over issuing permits for wells in Classes I-V, it does not yet have primacy for wells in Class VI, which means that final authorization still comes from the EPA. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:43 am by Madeline Thomas
  While Texas currently has “primacy” (approval from the EPA for permitting and enforcement authority) over issuing permits for wells in Classes I-V, it does not yet have primacy for wells in Class VI, which means that final authorization still comes from the EPA. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 11:43 am by Madeline Thomas
  While Texas currently has “primacy” (approval from the EPA for permitting and enforcement authority) over issuing permits for wells in Classes I-V, it does not yet have primacy for wells in Class VI, which means that final authorization still comes from the EPA. [read post]