Search for: "Louisiana v. Texas" Results 141 - 160 of 1,485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2019, 6:24 pm by Amy Howe
Instead, he relied on the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in McCoy v. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 6:13 am by ilpc
In 2017, individual plaintiffs Chad and Jennifer Brackeen, a couple from Texas, along with the state attorneys general in Texas, Louisiana, and Indiana, sued the U.S. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 10:13 am by Howard Friedman
The Louisiana law imposes a burden on access to abortion just as severe as that imposed by the Texas law, for the same reasons. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 3:41 am by Amy Howe
Texas Division, Son of Confederate Veterans, involving a state’s power to create a specialty license plate program which controls the messages that may be displayed; Brumfield v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 5:13 pm by Thomas Merrill
The Court continues to build on its recent record of unanimous decisions, ruling in Tarrant Regional Water District v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 9:39 am by Jamie LaPlante
Only employers in Texas, Nebraska, Arkansas, and Louisiana should continue operating under the prior definition of a “spouse” for FMLA purposes. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:26 pm by Liskow & Lewis
  The effect of these clauses in Texas, has always been questionable in light of the Texas Supreme Court’s opinion in Heritage Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 12:00 am by Raymond G. Lahoud
The lawsuit, brought by Texas and Louisiana, not only impacts the future of immigration enforcement in the country but also may impact the right of states to sue the federal government over discretionary policies. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:44 pm by Ilya Somin
" As noted in our amicus brief, that the state of Louisiana—which, like Texas, is also in the Fifth Circuit—is another such "rogue" state. [read post]
On January 12, 2023, the Louisiana Board of Tax Appeals (the “Board”) granted a motion for partial summary judgment in Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 12:11 pm by Gail Cecchettini Whaley
According to the court’s ruling, the public has an “abiding interest” in protecting state laws from “federal encroachment” (Texas v. [read post]