Search for: "Low v. Austin" Results 1 - 20 of 251
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2024, 9:07 pm by The Regulatory Review
Morrison, George Washington University Law School In Corner Post v. [read post]
3 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Corporate America, including our practice at Sidley Austin,[15] lobbied either against these rules or to moderate them. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 4:50 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The EEOC filed just three lawsuits in each of March and June, which represents a four-year low in each respective month. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:54 am by Jonathan H. Adler
In his book, Tatel wrote that Ginsburg told him about the behind-the-scenes dealings in a 2009 case, known as Northwest Austin v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”It is hard to counter that view when Justices like Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito flaunt their political sympathies or when the Court trashed its own precedents on the way to overturning Roe v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
The MDL court was careful to point out that it was not gainsaying Wells’ decision to limit his meta-analysis to case-control studies, or to his grading of any particular study as being of low quality. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm by Michael Lowe
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]