Search for: "Low v. Austin"
Results 81 - 100
of 258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2011, 9:53 pm
See City of Austin v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 9:56 am
City of Austin, Texas, 18-93, which has been rescheduled four times. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:46 pm
After all, the Timbs Opinion acknowledges its earlier ruling in Austin v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 10:59 am
Randall v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:08 pm
Austin, 418 U.S. 264, 28 [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 2:08 pm
Austin, 418 U.S. 264, 28 [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 11:56 am
The Austin-based project does advocacy and litigation work on behalf of low- and moderate-income Texans. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 2:03 pm
Keller of Austin. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 12:09 pm
Eurodif, 07-1059, and USEC v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:11 am
Pro-BP and pro-Exxon messages might overwhelm the airwaves and newspapers while the actual support for BP's and Exxon's messages is low. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 2:12 pm
As a result, he argues that the Duren v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:12 am
As he wrote in dissent in Austin v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 3:10 pm
Box 12786 Austin, TX 78711 Phone: (512) 424-6840 Fax: (512) 424-6890. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:44 pm
In the 1983 case of Karcher v. [read post]
12 Jan 2008, 9:43 am
Austin State University v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 8:48 am
He said the biggest problem was recruitment, with low wages compared to other law enforcement agencies like Austin or Plano.Lege raid on victim compensation funds leaves it drying upThe Crime Victim Compensation Fund is headed for insolvency, the Texas Senate Criminal Justice Committee was told yesterday, after the Legislature raided the fund in 2011 to balance the budget. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 8:40 am
Univ. of Tex. at Austin, 136 S. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 7:09 am
The recent 5-4 Supreme Court ruling on the New Haven Fire Department vocational advancement exam in Ricci v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:09 pm
Circuit heard oral arguments in this case, Mozilla v FCC. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:01 am
Even assuming the methodology is sound, the data is wrong and the calculation is far too low. [read post]
