Search for: "Low v. Austin"
Results 81 - 100
of 272
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2020, 7:28 pm
A “Force Majeure Event” is defined as acts, omissions, accidents and events which are beyond the reasonable control of the party claiming Force Majeure and which prohibit that party’s performance of its obligations under this Agreement including, without limitation, (i) acts of God, (ii) strikes or labor disruptions in the metropolitan area where the Event is scheduled to be held, (iii) civil riots or disturbances in the metropolitan area where the Event is scheduled to be… [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
[This is a version of a letter I sent to the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property today to call attention to various discrepancies in the proposed witness list, especially the presence of the Pirate Party at a hearing at the world’s greatest deliberative body. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 2:21 pm
Austin. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 10:47 am
Carroll v. [read post]
17 Jan 2020, 9:56 am
Duncan v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 12:50 pm
Young (argued), Baker Botts L.L.P., Austin, Texas; Van H. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 10:04 am
-Austin 2010, no pet.). [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:08 am
The Court of Appeal considered the usual loss of a chance principles in such cases, requiring: the claimant to prove the claim had more than a negligible prospect of success; the defendant solicitors to show that the litigation had no value; and the court to evaluate the prospects of success (Mount v Barker Austin [1988] PNLR 493). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 7:09 pm
Circuit heard oral arguments in this case, Mozilla v FCC. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 8:00 am
Boulter v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
Thanks to the New York Times and Matt Richtel for “Tainted Pork, Ill Consumers and an Investigation Thwarted. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Butts v. [read post]
12 Jul 2019, 2:03 am
He suggested that the low level of IP education within the country has contributed to entrenching this trend. [read post]
23 Jun 2019, 10:57 am
Powell, 811 S.W.2d 913, 917 (Tex. 1991)); see also Low v. [read post]
11 May 2019, 11:47 am
In Godoy v. [read post]
4 May 2019, 12:39 pm
Or is it merely another instance of sloppy treatment of a consumer debt case that is considered a low priority given the small amount in controversy, compared to tort and business-vs-business cases? [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 12:46 am
England v. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 1:49 am
-Austin 2008, pet. ref’d). [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:51 am
Further, the longer low-risk defendants were held, the more likely they were to reoffend. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 10:23 am
To clarify the complex issue of internet sales taxes, the 2018 Supreme Court case South Dakota v. [read post]
