Search for: "Low v. Austin" Results 101 - 120 of 237
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2016, 12:39 pm by Michael Grossman
While the number of Texan women injured by talcum powder may appear low, it should not be underestimated as an issue–especially given the possibility of many, many other undeclared claims. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 7:32 am
But there are masculine V words: virility, valiant, vigor (JFK's word), vitality, victory.You may remember that on Christmas eve in 2014, I was puzzled by something a saleslady in Austin, Texas said to me as I was looking for a sweater to give to one of my sons (both are men in their 30s). [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Supreme Court ruled 4-3 in Fisher v. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 5:25 am by David Kopel
 Rauch recounted the story of Austin Fulk, who was hanging out in a park where gay teenagers congregated. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 3:40 pm by Schachtman
Austin Bradford Hill, “The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm
  The compensation amount under Section 1.61 21(f)(5)(iii) remains unchanged at $215,000.The Code provides that the $1,000,000,000 threshold used to determine whether a multiemployer plan is a systematically important plan under section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(aa) is adjusted using the cost-of-living adjustment provided under Section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(bb). [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:20 am by Richard Rothstein
University of Texas at Austin (2013) was before the Court. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 4:33 am by Jon Hyman
— via The Emplawyerologist Determining What is Considered a Serious Medical Health Condition — via ERC Insights BlogLabor Relations If You Can’t Beat ‘Em, Join ‘Em: SEIU Befriending Franchisees — via Matt Austin Labor Law Calm Down: SCOTUS’s “Friedrichs” Case Won't Mean the End of the American Labor Movement — via Workplace Fairness      Related StoriesWIRTW #375 (the “post-it”… [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
Supreme Court has agreed to review a 2014 decision in which the Fifth Circuit, following the High Court’s instructions to apply a more exacting standard on remand, determined that the University of Texas at Austin’s (UT Austin) consideration of race in a portion of its admissions decisions withstands strict scrutiny (Fisher v University of Texas at Austin, Dkt No 14-981, cert granted June 29, 2015). [read post]