Search for: "Low v. Austin"
Results 121 - 140
of 249
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2016, 11:18 am
Foreign Minister Wang Yi suggested that the Philippines v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 10:04 am
Federal Election Commission-trust in our government has reached an all-time low. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 1:06 pm
The compensation amount under Section 1.61 21(f)(5)(iii) remains unchanged at $215,000.The Code provides that the $1,000,000,000 threshold used to determine whether a multiemployer plan is a systematically important plan under section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(aa) is adjusted using the cost-of-living adjustment provided under Section 432(e)(9)(H)(v)(III)(bb). [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 11:42 am
See, Mincey v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
Bartholomew v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 12:20 pm
University of Texas at Austin back for a second look? [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:20 am
University of Texas at Austin (2013) was before the Court. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 12:51 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:26 pm
Read the opinion here: Atwater v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 2:35 pm
Perhaps more importantly, for the past quarter century one of those few appellate decisions has been State v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 4:33 am
— via The Emplawyerologist Determining What is Considered a Serious Medical Health Condition — via ERC Insights BlogLabor Relations If You Can’t Beat ‘Em, Join ‘Em: SEIU Befriending Franchisees — via Matt Austin Labor Law Calm Down: SCOTUS’s “Friedrichs” Case Won't Mean the End of the American Labor Movement — via Workplace Fairness Related StoriesWIRTW #375 (the “post-it”… [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 7:20 am
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:06 pm
Supreme Court has agreed to review a 2014 decision in which the Fifth Circuit, following the High Court’s instructions to apply a more exacting standard on remand, determined that the University of Texas at Austin’s (UT Austin) consideration of race in a portion of its admissions decisions withstands strict scrutiny (Fisher v University of Texas at Austin, Dkt No 14-981, cert granted June 29, 2015). [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:59 am
In Kachina Pipeline Company, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:59 am
In Kachina Pipeline Company, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:13 am
Session 3: The Consumer in Different Trade Mark ContextsDo the questions that we have looked at in the first two sessions vary in different trademark and adjacent contexts? [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:34 pm
Burst at *14. failed to conduct an appropriate analysis of the entire dataset, along the lines of Sir Austin Bradford Hill’s nine factors. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
” Austin Bradford Hill, “The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation? [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
By adopting a more nuanced analysis, the Second Edition deprived defense counsel of a readily citable source for the proposition that low relative risks do not support inferences of specific causation. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 8:20 am
Estate of Nicole Yerkovich v. [read post]
