Search for: "Low v. Austin" Results 141 - 160 of 247
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2014, 1:38 pm
  For a married individual filing a separate return, the phase-out range is not subject to an annual cost-of-living adjustment and remains $0 to $10,000.The AGI limit for the saver’s credit (also known as the retirement savings contribution credit) for low- and moderate-income workers is $61,000 for married couples filing jointly, up from $60,000 in 2014; $45,750 for heads of household, up from $45,000; and $30,500 for married individuals filing separately and for singles,… [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:01 am by Lyle Denniston
Phillips of the Washington, D.C., office of Sidley Austin LLP, will represent the generic firms, with twenty-five minutes. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 7:10 am by Mark S. Humphreys
And in the once-laid-back university town of Austin, it's hard to find a downtown street without a construction crane towering overhead. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm by Schachtman
Lowe’s Home Centers, Inc., 563 F. 3d 171, 178 (6th Cir 2009); Westberry v. [read post]
31 May 2014, 1:34 pm by Michael Lowe
Under the CSA, there are five classification schedules (Schedules I – V) for their regulation, with Schedule I being the most restrictive and Schedule V the least. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
., office of Sidley Austin, with thirty minutes of time. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 10:29 am by Girardeau Spann
University of Texas at Austin to overrule Grutter v. [read post]
10 Sep 2013, 8:58 pm by Amber Walsh
The first half of 2013 was surfeit with reports of debt and equity transactions of all sizes within the medical device space, a few of which are detailed below: ·    Valeritas — the maker of the V-Go insulin delivery device — secured debt financing from Capital Royalty LP in the amount of $100 million to fund commercialization of the V-Go. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 10:27 am by Joey Fishkin
 Contrast, unfortunately, the Medicaid expansion: Congress did not anticipate the Court’s Spending Clause holding in NFIB v. [read post]