Search for: "Lowe Brothers Co. v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
Finally, Carpenter Co. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 8:12 am
Ct., NY Co., 6/20/18)Condo unit loss.Summary judgment to property's insurer.This was an action to collect on a default judgment Philadelphia, a condominium complex's insurer, had obtained against the owner of a vacant condo unit in which pipes froze and burst, causing water damage to the complex. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 8:17 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
  The nation-to-nation relationship we enjoy as tribal nations has never been confined to the borders of the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:57 am by Peter Tillers
United States, 320 U.S. 1, 60–61 (1943) (Frankfurter, J., dissenting in part) (“it is an old observation that the training of Anglo‐American judges ill fits them to discharge the duties cast upon them by patent legis‐lation”); Parke‐Davis & Co. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  By way of background, the publisher filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on December 23, 2011, against eBook publisher, Open Road Integrated Media. [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 5:29 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
  By way of background, the publisher filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on December 23, 2011, against eBook publisher, Open Road Integrated Media. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 8:36 am by John Elwood
The district court and First Circuit disagreed, citing United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:56 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Kalo Inoculant Co., 333 U.S. 127 (1948), has a holding keyed to patent-eligibility under 35 USC § 101, which was perpetuated in Bilski v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
At the time, insulators were often thought of as having relatively low-level asbestos exposure. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am by Schachtman
The common law, as it developed in the United States from the early 19th century, was hospitable to apportionments that avoided “entire” or “joint and several” liability. [read post]