Search for: "Lowe v. Fisher" Results 1 - 20 of 172
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2012, 1:40 pm by David Gans
Fisher is largely an attempt to seek a do-over of the Court’s 2003 opinion in Grutter v. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 9:14 am
Coase essentially alleges that Klein made up the Fisher Body story to fit the theory but that a hold up “never happened” because Fisher Body did not actually mislocate plants or adopt an inefficient low-capital production technology which were the two mechanisms for holdup Klein had previously discussed (more on what actually did happen later). [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 8:20 am by Richard Rothstein
The blog is delighted to host an online symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 2:23 am
I love it when the Court demonstrates a sense of humor.The following is from Fisher v Lowe, 122 Mich App 418, 333 NW2d 67 (1983) and came to me via [www.icle.org]:We thought that we would never seeA suit to compensate a tree.A suit whose claim in tort is prestUpon a mangled tree's behest;A tree whose battered trunk was prestAgainst a Chevy's crumpled crest;A tree that faces each new dayWith bark and limb in disarray;A tree that may forever bearA lasting need for… [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 10:58 am
The court said the defendant's conduct was low on the "hierarchy of reprehensibleness" because it involved purely economic harm, did not reflect an indifference to health or safety, did not involve repeat offenses, and did not involve intentional malice, trickery, or deceit. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Victoria VanBuren
by Holly Hayes One month ago, we started our health care conflict resolution series (see Part I,  Part II, Part III, and Part IV) focusing on the Roger Fisher, William Ury Getting to YES principled negotiation method involving: 1. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:42 pm by Stuart Taylor
But barring a surprise Trump win in the presidential election (which I would find even more distressing than the Court’s decision), few if any Court-watchers expect any significant restraint on racial preferences to come from the Justices after this decision, Fisher v. [read post]