Search for: "Lucas v State"
Results 261 - 280
of 673
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2010, 5:54 am
Lucas (1983) and Schweiker v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm
They had a soon together, Luca Andrea, who was born in 1970.The IPKat has already reported on a case brought jointly by Luca Andrea Dotti and Audrey Hepburn's other son, Sean Hepburn Ferrer, and decided by the Court of First Instance of Milan in 2015 concerning unauthorized evocation (not even direct use) of the likeness of Audrey Hepburn in an advertisement. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 8:38 am
From our friend Luca M. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 2:40 pm
Rhode Island, 533 U.S. 606, 614-15 (2001); Lucas v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 1:34 pm
After all, it was a shoreline development ban -- also based on erosion -- that resulted in the Lucas decision (Lucas v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 8:11 pm
The EU and Member States: FDI, Portfolio Investments, Golden Powers and SWFs Anna De Luca 8. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 3:25 am
Here's the schedule for the Lauterpacht Centre for International Law's Michaelmas Term 2010 Friday Lunchtime Lectures:October 8: Malgosia Fitzmaurice (Queen Mary, Univ. of London), Divided We Stand - The Case of the International Whaling CommissionOctober 15: Luca Radicati di Brozolo (Catholic Univ. of Milan), Judicial Decisions as Expropriation - The Implications of Saipem v BangladeshOctober 22: David Keane (Middlesex Univ.), Survival of the Fairest? [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 2:01 am
App. 2008), the case in which a California Court of Appeals held that a municipality's development moratorium was a Lucas taking. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 4:50 am
Lucas Cty. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:55 am
Interim Judgment On March 27, 2019, the SPC IP Tribunal issued its first decision in a patent case Valeo v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
(United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:49 pm
In Lingle v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:49 pm
In Lingle v. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
Lucas
• US v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:57 pm
No dice, held the court of appeals, in Lucas, "the United States Supreme Court held that in a takings case, where the property owner challenges a regulation as denying all economically beneficial or productive use of land, the regulatory action is 'compensable without a case-specific inquiry into the public interest advanced in support of the restraint.'" Slip op. at 9 (quoting Lucas v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 11:06 am
Damages Citing the case of Morris v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 7:23 am
See Lucas v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 7:46 am
It is hosted by Völkerrechtsblog and brilliantly co-organized by Justine Batura (Völkerrechtsblog), Anna Sophia Tiedeke (Völkerrechtsblog) and Michael Riegner (University of Erfurt; co-founder of the Völkerrechtsblog), who will feature as guest editor of the Symposium. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:43 am
Cal., 508 U.S. 602, 645 (1993) the court also pointed out that even if the district court’s financial analysis had been appropriate, diminution in value of property less than the 100%, the categorical taking established by the Supreme Court in Lucas v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
That principle may ultimately prove dispositive in BP v. [read post]
