Search for: "Lucas v State" Results 261 - 280 of 695
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2008, 2:11 pm
The Solicitor General had urged the Court to deny review in Lucas v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm
They had a soon together, Luca Andrea, who was born in 1970.The IPKat has already reported on a case brought jointly by Luca Andrea Dotti and Audrey Hepburn's other son, Sean Hepburn Ferrer, and decided by the Court of First Instance of Milan in 2015 concerning unauthorized evocation (not even direct use) of the likeness of Audrey Hepburn in an advertisement. [read post]
8 Sep 2014, 8:38 am
 From our friend Luca M. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 9:58 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp., 458 U.S. 419 (1982), or leaves land "without economically beneficial or productive options for its use," Lucas v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 1:34 pm
  After all, it was a shoreline development ban -- also based on erosion -- that resulted in the Lucas decision (Lucas v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 2:01 am
App. 2008), the case in which a California Court of Appeals held that a municipality's development moratorium was a Lucas taking. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:55 am by Hui Zhang
Interim Judgment On March 27, 2019, the SPC IP Tribunal issued its first decision in a patent case Valeo v. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 12:57 pm by Robert Thomas (
No dice, held the court of appeals, in Lucas, "the United States Supreme Court held that in a takings case, where the property owner challenges a regulation as denying all economically beneficial or productive use of land, the regulatory action is 'compensable without a case-specific inquiry into the public interest advanced in support of the restraint.'" Slip op. at 9 (quoting Lucas v. [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 9:43 am
Cal., 508 U.S. 602, 645 (1993) the court also pointed out that even if the district court’s financial analysis had been appropriate, diminution in value of property less than the 100%, the categorical taking established by the Supreme Court in Lucas v. [read post]