Search for: "Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 159
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2018, 7:08 am by Alan Brackett
Securities and Exchange Commission, finding the SEC’s administrative law judges to be unconstitutionally appointed. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 5:57 am by Alan Morrison
Securities and Exchange Commission in support of neither side. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 2:20 pm by Ronald Mann
Securities and Exchange Commission, which held that the process for appointing administrative law judges for the SEC violated the Constitution’s appointments clause. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 5:20 pm by Aurora Barnes
The petition of the day is: Lucia v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 7:33 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Securities & Exchange Commission, a constitutional challenge to the manner in which the SEC has traditionally appointed its Administrative Law Judges. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 12:32 pm by Alan Brackett
Securities and Exchange Commission On June 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Lucia v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Securities and Exchange Commission, the answer is at least two. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
Securities and Exchange Commission (case page at this link) Pereira v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 6:25 am
SEC that Securities and Exchange Commission Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) are “officers” for the purposes of the Constitution’s Appointments Clause. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 9:00 am by Andrew Hamm
Securities and Exchange Commission, Pereira v. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 6:21 am
SEC, a significant decision that holds that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC” or “Commission”) use of administrative law judges (“ALJs”) is constitutional. [read post]