Search for: "Lucia v. Securities and Exchange Commission" Results 1 - 20 of 170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2018, 7:08 am by Alan Brackett
Securities and Exchange Commission, finding the SEC’s administrative law judges to be unconstitutionally appointed. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 5:57 am by Alan Morrison
Securities and Exchange Commission in support of neither side. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 6:05 am by Doug Cornelius
Securities and Exchange Commission, it’s clear that administrative law judges of the US Securities and Exchange Commission are not mere federal employees but qualify as “Officers of the United States” under the Appointments Clause of the US Constitution. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 2:20 pm by Ronald Mann
Securities and Exchange Commission, which held that the process for appointing administrative law judges for the SEC violated the Constitution’s appointments clause. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 5:20 pm by Aurora Barnes
The petition of the day is: Lucia v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 7:33 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Securities & Exchange Commission, a constitutional challenge to the manner in which the SEC has traditionally appointed its Administrative Law Judges. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 12:32 pm by Alan Brackett
Securities and Exchange Commission On June 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Lucia v. [read post]
17 Mar 2020, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
Securities and Exchange Commission, the answer is at least two. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:12 pm by Andrew Hamm
Securities and Exchange Commission (case page at this link) Pereira v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 6:25 am
SEC that Securities and Exchange Commission Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) are “officers” for the purposes of the Constitution’s Appointments Clause. [read post]
31 Dec 1969, 4:00 pm
On June 21, 2018, the Supreme Court  held that the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) are “officers of the United States” whose appointments are therefore subject to the Appointments Clause of the Constitution for their actions to be valid. [read post]