Search for: "Lund v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 63
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2017, 11:43 am
Long.1 The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) broke new ground under federal Read more » The post State of New Jersey v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 11:43 am
Long.1 The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) broke new ground under federal Read more » The post State of New Jersey v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:37 pm
United States, the Court held that using sense-enhancing technology to obtain information about the interior of a home, even without a physical intrusion, constitutes a Fourth Amendment search, at least if the technology is not "in general public use. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 1:52 pm
Lund (Wayne State University Law School) has posted Understanding the Ministerial Exception (North Carolina Law Review, Vol. 90, No. 1, Fall 2011) on SSRN. [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 2:10 pm
Professor Lund disputed this, noting that the “pre-existing right” protected by the Second Amendment was the right as it existed in the United States under the common law and state constitutions, not the right as it existed under English law. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 9:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:49 pm
Nichols & John Witte, Religious Law and Religious Courts as a Challenge to the State (National Report for United States of America), (Religious Law and Religious Courts as a Challenge to the State: Legal Pluralism from a Comparative Perspective, Ed. [read post]
3 May 2017, 6:17 am
In State v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 3:30 am
Ford and eBay v. [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 7:21 am
United States and Weyhrauch v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 1:45 pm
” The answer is that fear of foreign prosecution does not suffice to allow the assertion of a privilege against self-incrimnination, see United State v. [read post]
8 Mar 2008, 2:35 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 7:32 am
Although there is substantial evidence that the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment was meant to protect the right of individuals to keep and bear arms from infringement by the states, the Supreme Court rejected this interpretation in United States v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 4:05 am
From SSRN:Mary Nobles Hancock, God Save the United States and this Honorable County Board of Commissioners: Lund, Bormuth, and the Fight Over Legislative Prayer, (76 Wash. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 11:17 am
Before Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 11:17 am
Before Citizens United v. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 1:41 pm
ShareMore than 80 amicus briefs were filed in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 4:33 am
See Lunde v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:38 am
” In another post (podcast) at the Fed Soc Blog, Thomas Berg, Christopher Lund, and Marty Lederman discuss Trinity Lutheran Church v. [read post]
2 Sep 2018, 7:50 am
And in this particular incident—a case called United States v. [read post]
