Search for: "Lutheran Church v. County of Los Angeles" Results 21 - 36 of 36
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  Shortly before Nollan was decided, in First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v County of Los Angeles, Justice Scalia joined the Court majority in ruling that under the Constitution’s “Just Compensation Clause,” a “temporary taking” denying a landowner of all use of his property entitles that landowner to compensation for the “temporary” loss of that use. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:57 pm by Tim Paone
  Shortly before Nollan was decided, in First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v County of Los Angeles, Justice Scalia joined the Court majority in ruling that under the Constitution’s “Just Compensation Clause,” a “temporary taking” denying a landowner of all use of his property entitles that landowner to compensation for the “temporary” loss of that use. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:52 am by Conor McEvily
Last week’s argument in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 6:34 am by Nabiha Syed
Politico, the Los Angeles Times, and the Washington Post all focus on the Justice’s description of Bush v. [read post]
County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987), the decision confirming that temporary takings require compensation. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 9:19 pm
County of Los Angeles, California, 482 U.S. 304, 317-18 (1987). [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 5:23 pm
County of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (1987)), or the invalidation of the government action (see, e.g., Lingle v. [read post]