Search for: "Lynch v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 1,733
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2024, 12:53 pm by Annette Demers
John’s v Wallace Lynch, et al (judgement reserved or rendered with reasons to follow, 16 November 2023, 40302). [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 12:05 am by Josh Richman
   How one state's 2008 law has effectively curbed how face recognition technology is used there, perhaps creating a model for other states or Congress to follow. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
On 7-8 March 2024, there was a hearing in the data protection case of Lynch v Serious Fraud Office KB-2024-000237. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
On 1 March 2024, The Rt Hon Lucy Frazer MP, the Secretary of State for Culture Media and Sport, and The Rt Hon James Cleverly MP, the Secretary of State for the Home Department, published their decision to vary a Restriction Order from the Leveson Inquiry to allow the use of the ledger cards for the purpose of the ongoing misuse of private information claim brought by seven claimants against Associated Newspapers. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 5:16 pm by Tom Ginsburg
She identifies the number of lynchings by state, documenting the spread of the practice outside the South. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The Great Migration had produced important swing blocs of black voters in northern and border states who in 1930 shocked the nation with their demand that a nominee to the Supreme Court care about racial justice. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 8:42 am
Today's advance release medical malpractice law opinion: Lynch v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
”[2]  In that same policy, the Commission articulated its belief “that a refusal to admit the allegations is equivalent to a denial, unless the defendant or respondent states that he neither admits nor denies the allegations. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]