Search for: "Lynn v. Lynn"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,637
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2023, 4:00 am
S. ____ (2023) at page 12 citing Campbell v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
” The magazine issue included the credit “source photograph © 1984 by Lynn Goldsmith/LGI. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 6:17 am
Lynn Retail, Inc. et al. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:15 pm
Supreme Court answered an exceedingly narrow question of copyright law with potentially sweeping impact: did the purpose and character of Andy Warhol’s below ‘Orange Prince’ work—as used on a 2016 Condé Nast magazine cover—support fair use of Lynn Goldsmith’s photograph of famed musician Prince Rogers Nelson a/k/a Prince? [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 9:15 am
Supreme Court answered an exceedingly narrow question of copyright law with potentially sweeping impact: did the purpose and character of Andy Warhol’s below ‘Orange Prince’ work—as used on a 2016 Condé Nast magazine cover—support fair use of Lynn Goldsmith’s photograph of famed musician Prince Rogers Nelson a/k/a Prince? [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:50 am
[17] Slip op. 2 (quoting Google LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 11:53 am
Supreme Court found that the purpose and character of the use of “Orange Prince” by the Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts (AWF) weighed against a finding of fair use of Lynn Goldsmith’s photograph of the artist known as Prince. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 11:49 am
[17] Slip op. 2 (quoting Google LLC v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 11:39 am
[17] Slip op. 2 (quoting Google LLC v. [read post]
30 May 2023, 12:09 pm
However, the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
29 May 2023, 7:15 am
Lynn Goldsmith, et al., No. 21-869, Brief for Amici Curiae Supporting Petitioner (U.S. [read post]
26 May 2023, 10:56 am
[17] Slip op. 2 (quoting Google LLC v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 10:00 am
They pointed out that in the recent case of Google v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 10:05 am
LYNN GOLDSMITH TWITTER V. [read post]
24 May 2023, 10:05 am
LYNN GOLDSMITH TWITTER V. [read post]
23 May 2023, 9:42 am
Acuff-Rose and Google v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 6:31 am
As others have noted, there is a "David and Goliath" quality to the ruling that photographer Lynn Goldsmith, breaking barriers as a woman in the male-dominated rock-n-roll photography field and earning a modest living from selling photographs to magazines for around $400, was entitled to compensation for Andy Warhol making an unauthorized tracing and silkscreen of... [read post]
22 May 2023, 1:38 am
Andy Warhol Foundation v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 12:01 pm
ShareThursday’s decision in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 11:30 am
[4] Andy Warhol Found. for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]