Search for: "Lytle v. Lytle" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2018, 6:00 am by alysondrake
” Image via Kansas Historical Society.Lutie Lytle was one of six children to John Lytle, an active politician in Topeka, Kansas. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 4:29 am
Employee terminated following loss of a license required to perform the duties of the positionLytle v U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 5:03 am by Ben Vernia
On September 14, the Third Circuit issued a decision in Lytle v Capital Area Intermediate Unit, a case alleging unlawful retaliation under the False Claims Act. [read post]
27 Nov 2009, 6:14 am by Vincent LoTempio
Michael Berchou, a partner at Phillips Lytle LLP, believes if the past is any indication, change may be on the horizon. [read post]
15 May 2015, 2:17 pm by Joe Patrice
[Jezebel] * Seema Iyer talks about one of our favorite recent cases, Driskell v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 11:54 am by Liisa Speaker
[Lytle v Malady, 458 Mich 153, 177; 579 NW2d 906 (1998)]It went on to say that “The final element—replacement by a younger person—is a prima facie element in both workforce reduction cases and those where workforce reduction is not at issue. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 5:12 am by Susan Brenner
Ross sent her father, Jim Lytle, to the house . . . . [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Jones, University of Wisconsin, “The Other Operation Dixie: PublicEmployees and the New Deal Order”David Bensman, Rutgers University, and Donna Kesselman, University of Paris, EstCreteil, “From the New Deal Standard Employment Relationship to EmploymentGrey Zone”Commentator and Chair: Bob Master, Communications Workers of AmericaThe Politics of Regulation In and Beyond the New Deal Order Paul Sabin, Yale University, “Environmental Law and the End of the New Deal… [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 4:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is well settled that “[a] cause of action for legal malpractice accrues when the malpractice is committed” (Elstein v Phillips Lytle, LLP, 108 AD3d 1073, 1073 [4th Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks omitted]), and that, “[w]hat is important [in determining the accrual date] is when the malpractice was committed, not when the client discovered it” (Glamm v Allen, 57 NY2d 87, 95 [1982]; see Town of Amherst v Weiss, 120 AD3d 1550,… [read post]