Search for: "M. L. B. v. S. L. J" Results 81 - 100 of 1,709
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
As my article notes, courts do make exceptions to the litigate-in-your-own-name rule, and there are plausible arguments that pseudonymous litigation should be more commonly allowed; but this is still a good articulation of the dominant view: Pilots X, Y, Z, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, & M sued Boeing about its 737 MAX airplanes. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 9:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
For example, the underlying M&A litigation at issue in Starz Acquisition, LLC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm by admin
Joiner, 522 U.S. 136, 145-46 (1997) (holding that an expert witness’s reliance on a study was misplaced when the subjects of the study “had been exposed to numerous potential carcinogens”) First Circuit Bricklayers & Trowel Trades Internat’l Pension Fund v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm by Giles Peaker
In Collier v P & M J Wright (Holdings) Ltd (2007) EWCA Civ 1329 that test had been held to be the same as that for summary judgment. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 6:55 am by Geneviève Lay (CA)
En effet, l’employée a induit en erreur à la fois son employeur, son médecin ainsi que la CNESST afin de bénéficier d’un régime d’indemnisation auquel elle n’avait pas droit, ce qui fut révélé lors de la surveillance. [read post]
7 Nov 2021, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Même si la divulgation est retardée pour des motifs de privilège, la poursuite a l’obligation de divulguer l’existence du renseignement. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
  Right-to-carry laws and violent crime The most-cited study supporting New York's very restrictive law is John J. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm by Eugene Volokh
But in general I'm not at all sure what the right answer is on most of those cases. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
J’ajouterais aussi qu’il apparaît du dossier que n’eût été le battage médiatique, le gouvernement n’aurait pas menacé l’appelant de le destituer. [read post]