Search for: "M. v. M."
Results 1 - 20
of 54,486
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2023, 6:37 am
The post MÉLANGE DAVIS v. [read post]
1 Mar 2022, 11:55 am
JONES v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 7:42 am
Additional Resources:Stacy M. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 2:03 am
Another of his cases, Local Authority v M & M & Ors [2009] EWHC 3172, was reported yesterday and in it he took "the unprecedented step of excluding a father with parental responsibility, whose whereabouts are not unknown, from any knowledge of, let alone participation in, care proceedings involving his children". [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 7:08 am
The case of M v M [2010] EWHC 2817 (Fam) (for some reason also reported with the citation [2011] EWHC 3574) involved a successful Hadkinson application on behalf of the wife.The case concerned the wife's application for interim periodical payments, under Part III Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 5:34 am
BELL v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 1:42 pm
Failure to do may result in a situation similar to what plaintiff in Stacy M. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 8:14 am
LANCASTER v. [read post]
16 May 2023, 8:23 am
PHILLIPS v. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 8:25 am
R v M; [2008] WLR (D) 297 “Where a defendant in criminal proceedings was said to have breached a restraint order, imposed under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, by making certain prohibited transactions a judge of the Crown Court had jurisdiction to try an application made by the prosecution for the defendant to be committed for contempt. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 7:23 am
AL. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 8:18 am
TENNER v. [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 8:25 am
McCORMICK v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 12:01 pm
POTTER v. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 2:35 pm
M. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:11 am
[…] The post Alfred and Betty M. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 8:18 am
CARRIE M. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
W v M and others [2011] EWHC 2443 (Fam); [2011] WLR (D) 283 “Pursuant to section 4 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 it was not in the best interests of a patient diagnosed as being in a minimally conscious state to authorise the withdrawal of all life sustaining treatment including nutrition and hydration by artifical means (‘ANH’).” WLR Daily, 28th September 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:24 am
Regina v M (A) [2012] WLR (D) 228 “Where there had been a breach of the balloting requirements in the selection of members of a jury, unless the defendant made clear his objection to the breach, at or as soon as practicable after, the time it occurred the irregularity could not be corrected on appeal.” WLR Daily, 24th July 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 5:05 pm
At about 2 a.m. on September 8th, Coast Guard Sector Charleston watchstanders were notified that the M/V GOLDEN RAY, a 656-foot cargo ship, had capsized in the St. [read post]
