Search for: "MAINE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ADMIN" Results 1 - 9 of 9
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2010, 10:41 am by Andrew Frisch
South Carolina Dept. of Corrections In this case Plaintiff, an employee of the South Carolina Department of Corrections (“SCDC”), sought compensation for overtime work under Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b).  [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 12:12 pm by Thomas Kaufman
Farmers Insurance were wrong, the Cal Supremes noted that those were all decided under the pre-2001 Wage Order and their interpretation is not correct for cases arising post-2001.  [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
Each step being a phase for assessment and correction. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 12:53 am by Jasmine Joseph
Little that it wrote about the Insular Cases was correct - as to law or fact. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia September 23, 2011 Gonzalez-Droz v. [read post]
20 Oct 2006, 1:49 pm
The FTA must also comply with Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 ("DOTA"), 49 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
Stored Communications Act (SCA), which is part of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA),[9] has been interpreted by at least two U.S. courts to forbid production of stored data of certain types only where the data are stored in the United States.[10]  With respect to U.S. foreign intelligence surveillance, the rules are much more complex,[11] but unlike the Wiretap Act and the SCA, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act[12] generally prohibits conduct only by persons acting under… [read post]