Search for: "MARKS v. LEIS"
Results 1 - 20
of 80
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
Não se trata de inferência factual ou indutiva nem de deduções baseadas em leis universais, mas de procedimento paradigmático — pois paradigmática foi a fotografia para a epistemologia benjaminiana da História.6 O paradigma não é um atributo ou parte de um fenômeno, mas, desde Platão, uma “relação” entre sensível e mental: “a relação… [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 3:42 am
BrazilSilveira v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 1:11 am
Nicholas Leicester [2024] ECC Lei 2 This judgment (which was preceded by three interim judgments with the neutral citations [2023] ECC Lei 1, [2023] ECC Lei 2 and [2023] ECC Lei 3, dealing with preliminary issues) relates to a petition for the introduction of a new altar frontal displaying the colours of the Progress Pride flag, the church having come to be regarded over time as a safe worshipping space for LGBTQIA+ people of faith. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 9:43 am
¿Dworkin, Waldron o Mark Tushnet? [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am
The Metropolitan police commissioner Mark Rowley responded to criticism from the Home Secretary Suella Braverman of his force’s decision not to makes arrests for shouts of “jihad” at an anti-Israel protest. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
The Federal Court would make legal history in the defamation battle between Sydney MP Alex Greenwich and former NSW One Nation leader Mark Latham if it empanelled a jury to hear the case, the Sydney Morning Herald reports. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:37 am
This publication marks the 30th issue of this Bulletin. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
IPSO Satisfactory Remedy – 18621-23 Booley v ok.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18524-23 Barnwell v The Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18355-23 A complainant v nationalworld.com, 14 Confidential sources (2021), No breach – after investigation Satisfactory Remedy – 17293-23 Reynolds v swindonadvertiser.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 18392-23 Marshall De… [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 2:23 am
On Thursday 27 July 2023 there were hearings in the libel cases of Jusan Technologies Ltd v. (1) The Bureau of Investigative Journalism (2) Telegraph Media Group Ltd and Jusan Technologies Ltd v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
” The letter before claim written to Mark Zuckerburg, dated 5 July 2023, accused Meta of hiring dozens of former Twitter employees with access to highly confidential information about the platform, many of whom “improperly retained Twitter documents and electronic devices. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am
On 23 June 2023 Steyn J heard an application in the case of Dube v Warwick. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am
This week marked 10 years since former NSA contractor, Edward Snowden exposed the mass surveillance practice employed by the UK and US. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am
IPKat considers how this reveals a dystopian vision of the trademark world, composed of words, images and objects, “floating about but not directly connected to the goods, and therefore fair game to be monopolised as a trade mark right. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am
On the same day, Linden J heard the trial of a preliminary issue in the libel case of Evans v McMahon and Kerr J heard an appeal in the case of Samuels v Laycock. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 5:13 am
The voices of dissidence continue to be heard in Cuba, which marks it as quite a different civil space from that in China. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
” [v] The government then initiated the construction of hydroelectric power plants in the region, marked by environmental impacts and violation of the indigenous rights. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 5:56 am
On 29 November 2017, an individual named Seng Lei (‘Seng’) filed an application (No. 27792495) in class 30 for food products to the Trade Mark Office of China (TMO). [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 4:38 am
Descarga el Informe Positivo del Proyecto de la Cámara 2 El 25 de marzo de 2021 la Comisión de lo Jurídico celebró una Sesión Pública de Consideración Final (mark-up session) para este proyecto de ley, según lo dispone el Reglamento de la Cámara de Representantes. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 7:38 am
El abogado dijo que la DCA nació en 1997 como un intento federal de controlar la «obscenidad» y el contenido «patentemente ofensivo», pero en el caso Reno v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
The members of Congress wrote a letter to then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper referencing Section 1237 and asking Esper to release a list that complied with the provision. [read post]
