Search for: "MARKS v. UNITED"
Results 1 - 20
of 10,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2018, 5:30 am
The petitioner argues in the alternative that Marks be abandoned, and the United States attempts... [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 5:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 10:35 am
Earlier this month, the Court granted review of Hughes v.... [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 1:00 pm
Many law professors were watching Hughes because it promised to revisit the rule from Marks v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 1:35 pm
In United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 11:25 am
United States (covered earlier here and here). [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 1:34 am
RED DAWGRED BULLJane LambertChancery Division (Mr Justice Adam Johnson) Monster Energy Company v Red Bull GmbH [2022] EWHC 2155 (Ch) (12 Aug 2022)One of the grounds for opposing a trade mark is that it is identical with or similar to an earlier trade mark that has a reputation in the United Kingdom and the use of the later mark without due cause would take unfair advantage of, or be detrimental [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 9:12 pm
Specialist costs counsel Dr Mark Friston has put together an invaluable guide to the recent decision in MGN v United Kingdom, concerning success fees. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 6:18 pm
United States and the Effects of the Marks Rule”: Richard M. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 4:30 am
Jane LambertChancery Division (Mr Justice Marcus Smith) Lifestyle Equities CV v The Copyrights Group Ltd and others [2021] EWHC 1212 (Ch) (10 May 2021)This was an action for trade mark infringement and passing off, The first claimant was the registered proprietor of the following European Union and United Kingdom trade marks and the second claimant was its exclusive licensee:EU005482484 [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:39 am
On April 15, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 8:39 am
On April 15, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 12:05 am
United States: 23 For Government, 1 For Taxpayer: Reply Brief For Petitioners, Moore v. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 5:49 am
" Polytree (Hong Kong) Co., Ltd., et. al. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 5:45 am
Hughes v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 11:30 am
Popofsky & Anthony Biagioli (Ropes & Gray) address The Sherman Act's Extra-Territorial Reach: Unresolved Questions Raised by United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 1:42 pm
United States, holding that its decision in Johnson v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 7:53 pm
Marks v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 11:26 am
" ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 9:56 am
Furthermore, in the context of cancellation proceedings, the proprietor of an industrial property right, particularly an earlier mark, must establish that they may prohibit the use of the EU trade mark at issue, not only on the filing or priority date of that mark but also on the date on which EUIPO decides on the application for a declaration of invalidity (Style & Taste v EUIPO (T‑169/19) EU:T:2021:318).It therefore follows that, for the evidence of… [read post]