Search for: "MARTIN v. SUPERIOR COURT"
Results 1 - 20
of 327
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2010, 2:25 pm
Superior Court (State of California), 182 Cal. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Nat'l Western Life Ins. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 6:00 am
Superior Court, ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (September 10, 2007), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Five) held that the presence of a retail intermediary does not bar a UCL restitution award. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 3:42 pm
Here is the summary from the Court site:The Hamilton Superior Court granted Martin Marietta's request for a preliminary injunction preventing Carmel from enforcing an ordinance that regulates mining operations. [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Superior Court, ___ Cal.5th ___ (Feb. 8, 2018). [read post]
9 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Superior Court, ___ Cal.5th ___ (Feb. 8, 2018). [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 12:20 am
Case preview: Rakusen v Jepson – Rent Repayment Orders (RROs) and superior landlords in the Court of Appeal Next month the Court of Appeal will hear an appeal from a landlord in a rent repayment order case, Rakusen v Jepson. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 3:47 am
The piece is heavily influenced by Martin Redish's book Wholesale Justice. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Superior Court (Cal. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 5:50 am
Martin, 2018 NCBC 5. [read post]
20 May 2013, 7:38 am
The court of appeals in Friddle v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 8:40 am
The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court recently decided that it had. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:16 am
Puckett in Wilkes County Superior Court. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 9:09 am
The Superior Court of Los Angeles Crosby v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 2:28 pm
The court also cited Jackson v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 3:43 pm
Martin v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 10:50 am
Martin, 2018 NCBC 5. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:24 am
The Supreme Court dodged the constitutional issue in Brannon v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 9:35 am
Chahine v Martins: Not so fast… Despite, the decision in Douglas, the more recent case of Chahine v Martins, which was heard on April 14 and decided on April 15, 2020, seems to indicate that a lack of previous court order in regards to parenting will not prohibit parties from dealing with a unilateral elimination of parenting time as a result of COVID-19 on an urgent basis in court. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 9:11 am
In a recent High Court decision, Thomson Ecology Ltd. v. [read post]
