Search for: "MARVEL ENTERTAINMENT LLC" Results 21 - 40 of 69
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2015, 4:59 pm
Marvel Entertainment, LLC: Royalty Payments After Term Patent ExpirationCHAPTER 3. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 3:51 am by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Por otro lado, Marvel Entertainment, LLC (en adelante Marvel) manufactura y vende productos relacionados al personaje de ficción Hombre Araña. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
.* Kimble v Marvel Entertainment: when post-expiry patent royalties meet stare decisisThe unsatisfying U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 11:06 am
Supreme Court, in revisiting the issue in the case of Kimble v Marvel Entertainment, LLC (as reported by AmeriKat on June 30th), would provide some clarity. [read post]
Marvel Entertainment, LLC (2015) rejuvenates a 50-year-old rule that limits collecting patent royalties after a patent expires. [read post]
12 Jul 2015, 5:55 am by SHG
Copyright © 2015 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 1:04 pm by 500law
Marvel Entertainment, LLC[1], the Supreme Court upheld previous precedent[2] which created a bright line rule preventing patent owners from obtaining royalties from sales made after the patent term has expired. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:45 am by Michael Baniak
Marvel Entertainment, LLC, just handed down June 22, 2015, the Supreme Court reaffirmed the 50 year old holding  of  Brulotte v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:55 am by Jason Rantanen
Marvel Entertainment, LLC (2015) Download Opinion Opinion by Justice Kagan. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:23 am
Marvel Entertainment, LLC, decided June 21, 2015).Bazinga! [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 8:18 am by Walter Olson
Marvel Entertainment, LLC is here: I see what you did there, Justice Kagan. pic.twitter.com/sxjm3396xB — Nicholas Bagley (@nicholas_bagley) June 22, 2015 Nice one, Kagan. [read post]