Search for: "MARVEL v. UNITED STATES"
Results 1 - 20
of 243
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 9:37 am
The difference between “dolls” and “other toys,” as laid out in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”), is that dolls must clearly represent a human being. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:49 pm
This law provides an exception to the general rule that the person who creates a work is the legal author of that work; according to copyright law in the United States, a work “made for hire” is legally owned by the employer, and not the employee. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 5:32 am
United States, 532 U.S. 822 (2001), which supported the government’s consolidated group/single entity theory. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:45 am
Ericsson:Contrary to Marvell’s contention, Harris Corp. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:26 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In the 57-page opinion this week in Marvel Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:39 am
The example in the headline, United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 11:56 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently made an important ruling regarding the territorial limits of damages in a patent infringement lawsuit in Carnegie Mellon University v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 7:00 am
Marvel Entertainment LLC et. al., Case Number 1:16-cv-02499 United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Filed April […] [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:58 pm
What a marvelous dissent by Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, joined by judges Pregerson, Reinhardt, Thomas, and Watford, in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 4:03 pm
Since Chimel - many other cases have broadened this holding including the case of United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:26 pm
Their approach centers on the idea that Marvel and Disney intellectual properties, especially characters, compete for the attention of the same market. [ 14 ] Several of these analysts point out that Disney has repeatedly tried and failed to capture the young male market share with their characters, especially in the television and film realms, but succeeded with young women. [ 15 ] These analysts point to Marvel’s strong hold on young males and weakness towards female in… [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
On November 5, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in an unpublished disposition, issued its opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
On November 5, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in an unpublished disposition, issued its opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
United States v. Fosler: CAAF holds Article 134 adultery sample specification fails to state offense
8 Aug 2011, 11:53 pm
Is Parker v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:10 pm
Marvel relied on Brulotte v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
Kimble appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 9:30 am
Clarence Earl Gideon March 18, 1963, was the date on which the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of a petitioner who was also a Florida convict. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 7:49 am
Jumara v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Joel Edan Friedlander, Friedlander & Gorris, has posted The Desegregation Decrees of the Delaware Court of Chancery, which is forthcoming in the Delaware Law Review:It is often said that the United States Supreme Court affirmed Chancellor Collins J. [read post]
22 Dec 2019, 9:15 am
Marvel, the United States Supreme Court rejuvenated a 50-year-old rule that limits collecting patent royalties after a patent expires. [read post]
