Search for: "MARVEL v. UNITED STATES" Results 1 - 20 of 235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Feb 2012, 9:37 am by Zach Feinberg
The difference between “dolls” and “other toys,” as laid out in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”), is that dolls must clearly represent a human being. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:49 pm by Eva Arevuo
 This law provides an exception to the general rule that the person who creates a work is the legal author of that work; according to copyright law in the United States, a work “made for hire” is legally owned by the employer, and not the employee. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 5:32 am by admin
United States, 532 U.S. 822 (2001), which supported the government’s consolidated group/single entity theory. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 11:45 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Ericsson:Contrary to Marvell’s contention, Harris Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:39 am by Kevin
The example in the headline, United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 9:26 am by Sheldon Toplitt
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)In the 57-page opinion this week in Marvel Entertainment, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 11:56 am by 500law
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently made an important ruling regarding the territorial limits of damages in a patent infringement lawsuit in Carnegie Mellon University v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
It is about whether Kirby’s work qualifies as work-for-hire under the Copyright Act of 1909, as interpreted by the courts, notably the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 8:58 pm by Solomon Wisenberg
What a marvelous dissent by Chief Judge Alex Kozinski, joined by judges Pregerson, Reinhardt, Thomas, and Watford, in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 7:00 am by Alex Nealon
Marvel Entertainment LLC et. al., Case Number 1:16-cv-02499 United States District Court for the Southern District of New York Filed April […] [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:26 pm
Their approach centers on the idea that Marvel and Disney intellectual properties, especially characters, compete for the attention of the same market. [ 14 ] Several of these analysts point out that Disney has repeatedly tried and failed to capture the young male market share with their characters, especially in the television and film realms, but succeeded with young women. [ 15 ] These analysts point to Marvel’s strong hold on young males and weakness towards female in… [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:24 am by James Goodman
On November 5, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in an unpublished disposition, issued its opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:24 am by James (Jim) A. Goodman
On November 5, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in an unpublished disposition, issued its opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 12:00 am
  Kimble appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 9:30 am by azatty
Clarence Earl Gideon March 18, 1963, was the date on which the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of a petitioner who was also a Florida convict. [read post]