Search for: "MASTER v. STATE"
Results 81 - 100
of 3,913
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2007, 5:48 am
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments today on the Microsoft v. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 12:35 pm
Baker and Katrina Geddes, Master in Public Policy Candidate at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government, have written a thought provoking article entitled, “Corporate Power Unbound: Investor-State Arbitration of IP Monopolies on Medicines – Eli Lilly v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 1:35 pm
on Prescription Medication & Alcohol: Interaction and Metabolism – Determining Therapeutic v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 4:00 pm
In Apeldyn Corp. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 6:27 am
Supreme Court will take the Special Master's report and responses by the states into consideration and issue a final decision. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 8:58 am
This month, in Marketing Information Masters v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 3:20 am
The Supreme Court decision Dred Scott v. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
Range v. [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 2:20 pm
Special master Michael Patrick King ruled, in State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:09 am
Gabriel Jackson Chin, University of California, Davis, School of Law, has published The Blueprint for Dred Scott: United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:09 am
Gabriel Jackson Chin, University of California, Davis, School of Law, has published The Blueprint for Dred Scott: United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 3:19 pm
The Court stated: “Therefore, even assuming, without deciding, that the 1997 EIR for the Airport Master Plan constitutes a program EIR, as CAAP argues, we are not persuaded that the proposed changes to the Airport Master Plan that are addressed in the eighth addendum constitute a new project that requires a new EIR. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 12:08 pm
In Absolute Activist Value Master Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
10 May 2016, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Redeemer Committee of Highland Credit Strategies Funds v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 12:28 pm
Today, the New Jersey Supreme Court issued a decision in Mount Laurel Township v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 8:21 am
The special master concluded that the PDP’s safe harbor provisions do not allow for transfer of data to the United States. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 9:01 am
She was named special master in the case of South Carolina v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 7:58 am
We argue in the brief that even if a state can be permitted to enact anticompetitive laws under Parker v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 7:31 am
Listening to the oral argument in Case#: 21-1249 International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pil v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:24 pm
Hennis v. [read post]
