Search for: "MATTER OF ELECTRIC POWER & LIGHT CORP." Results 41 - 60 of 108
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism (IAM) The… [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
Morse, 56 U.S. 62 (1853), the Supreme Court held that a claim to electromagnetism was not eligible for patent protection because the patentee "claim[ed] the exclusive right to every improvement where the motive power is the electric or galvanic current, and the result is the marking or printing intelligible characters, signs, or letters at a distance. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
However, this is not to say that federal courts never find standing over condemnation matters. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Xerox Corp., 718 P.2d 929 (Alaska 1986), the court was “persuaded by the comments to the Restatement (Second) of Torts §500, which define reckless disregard of safety. [read post]
Some have argued that, because the Nation’s approach to climate change is politically contested,[1] and since these matters affect major policy questions over which Congress has not granted the SEC new, explicit powers, the Commission lacks authority to require disclosure in this area.[2] For the reasons given below, the Commission should disregard these claims, focusing instead on the challenging policy choices that any finalization of the proposal would require. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
Occlutech (Kluwer Patent Blog) Greece Court of Appeal Thessaloniki: Patent covering ornamental light device lacks novelty and inventive step: Palaiochorinos S.A. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:06 am
 Lastly, Norges Bank has announced its decisions to revoke the exclusions of Empire District Electric Company and Anglo American PLC; and to end the observation of EDP - Energias de Portugal S.A, Endesa S.A., Portland General Electric Co (PGE), and Enel SpA. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
: (IPEG),Proponents: Slow better than poor for WIPO Development Agenda: (Intellectual Property Watch),Chatham House Rule comes to WIPO Development Agenda: (IP Updates),New campaign by a group of Second Life Avatars to raise awareness of the ‘theft’ of virtual items: (IPKat), (Patry Copyright Blog),World IP Day is on the way: (IPKat),Watch for IP leaks from publications: (Securing Innovation),Lessig’s (Government) FOSS market: (,Notions of free:… [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:53 am by Jack Goldsmith
    In light of these episodes and statements, and in light of the government’s failure once again to impose any meaningful sanctions on China, ask yourself:  Why is the U.S. government not treating the China digital threat as a core national security interest? [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm by admin
The Taking Clause Does Not Establish Despotic Powers Most frequently cited in recent newspaper articles is the characterization of the power to take as a “despotic power,” a quotation cited from VanHorne’s Lessee v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:08 pm
“In light of this tragedy, which is yet another in a long list of Planned Parenthood abuses, we call on President Obama to immediately withdraw all federal funding and personal support from Planned Parenthood,” said Newman. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am by Marie Louise
AWH Corp (Patently-O)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Interpreting the scope of patent assignments beyond family members: MHL TEK v. [read post]