Search for: "MATTER OF ELECTRIC POWER & LIGHT CORP."
Results 41 - 60
of 115
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2017, 9:01 pm
Pardon the mixed metaphors, but the best way to drain the swamp that many see in Washington, D.C. is for the government to shine light—release emails and notes of conversations and meetings about the litany of scandals that have surrounded the last eight years.Justice Brandeis told us over a century ago, “Sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants; electric light the most efficient policeman. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 7:08 am
Print Three Franchising Corp., 2003 CarswellOnt 2038, 64 O.R. (3d) 533. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 7:23 am
Most of the books you mention (like The Brethren too, for that matter) were written while the Burger Court was still ongoing. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
The case has brought to light critical and nuanced issues and facts which absolutely necessitate scrutiny and reflection. [read post]
2 Jan 2016, 8:36 am
But short of a miracle, the 25-megawatt plant run by IHI Power Services Corp. will burn its last wood chips in July, when its power purchase agreement with Pacific Gas & Electric Co. expires. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
Xerox Corp., 718 P.2d 929 (Alaska 1986), the court was “persuaded by the comments to the Restatement (Second) of Torts §500, which define reckless disregard of safety. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:53 am
In light of these episodes and statements, and in light of the government’s failure once again to impose any meaningful sanctions on China, ask yourself: Why is the U.S. government not treating the China digital threat as a core national security interest? [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
The Office of Medicaid now appears to take the position that all assets held in any Irrevocable Trust should be counted for MassHealth purposes, despite having regulations to the contrary. [read post]
5 May 2015, 3:26 pm
The Office of Medicaid now appears to take the position that all assets held in any Irrevocable Trust should be counted for MassHealth purposes, despite having regulations to the contrary. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 6:47 am
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
The court held that the ordinance was a police-power regulatory action to which the categorical exemptions applied. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
Theater Corp. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
This one gets less play than the others – perhaps because of how courts sometimes use “communication” to get around it in non-prescription medical product cases (more on that to come), or sometimes because plaintiffs might use the same testimony to claim medical malpractice.But prescriber failure to read can be a powerful tool. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Chenery Corp., by upholding agency action based on, and by purporting to “defer” to, an interpretation of the Clean Air Act that the EPA itself not only never adopted – but in fact expressly rejected. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 12:35 pm
However, at a big, interminable meeting like ICANN, power is power – electrical power. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 8:48 am
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp., 615 F. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 8:05 am
But to begin, in this post I’ll discuss a couple of important preliminary matters that frame the unusual Article III questions in these two cases: I. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 1:08 pm
“In light of this tragedy, which is yet another in a long list of Planned Parenthood abuses, we call on President Obama to immediately withdraw all federal funding and personal support from Planned Parenthood,” said Newman. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 1:11 pm
Morse, 56 U.S. 62 (1853), the Supreme Court held that a claim to electromagnetism was not eligible for patent protection because the patentee "claim[ed] the exclusive right to every improvement where the motive power is the electric or galvanic current, and the result is the marking or printing intelligible characters, signs, or letters at a distance. [read post]
