Search for: "MATTER OF TROPEA v. Tropea"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2023, 7:57 am
Child custody is often one of the most emotionally charged issues in a divorce or separation case. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 12:39 pm
The factors to be considered by the court in its analysis are listed in Matter of Tropea v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 3:03 pm
In the case of Matter of Tropea v. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 8:39 pm
In the case of Matter of Tropea v. [read post]
4 Nov 2012, 8:39 pm
In the case of Matter of Tropea v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:38 am
” Instead, Justice Dollinger turned for guidance to the more flexible analysis set forth by the Court of Appeals in Tropea v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:37 pm
As enunciated in leading case Matter of Tropea v Tropea, the ultimate question is "what outcome is most likely to serve the best interests of the child. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:09 am
The Court concluded that the mother established by the requisite preponderance of the evidence that the proposed relocation would serve the child's best interests" (Matter of Tropea v. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
The mother appealed and argued that her proposed 17-mile move from Valley Cottage to Rye did not constitute a “relocation” that required an analysis of the best interests of the child and the factors enunciated in the 1996 Court of Appeals decision in Matter of Tropea v. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:49 pm
[hat tip to John Tropea for sharing this video.] [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 1:24 am
Rolling River Associates Ltd.NASSAU COUNTYFamily Law'Tropea' Analysis Needed to Determine if Mother's Relocation of 25 Miles in Best Interest of ChildMatter of J.W. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 1:45 pm
Tropea v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:53 am
Tropea, 87 N.Y.2d 727, 736 [1996] ). [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 5:57 am
While this trend toward focusing on the best interests of the child has had a liberalizing effect in certain jurisdictions, see Tropea v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
,v. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:28 am
Parent’s Incarceration Not an Automatic Reason for Blocking Visitation In Matter of Granger v Miscercola, --- N.E.2d ----, 2013 WL 1798581 (N. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:32 am
See Gitter v Gitter, 396 F.3d 124 (2d Cir.); Feder v. [read post]
