Search for: "MCROBERTS v. MCROBERTS" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2023, 4:22 am by Peter Mahler
In many if not most of these cases, the pre-amendment provision retains at least some of the protections found in Section 417 (b)’s default rule against adverse impact on the non-consenting members, as illustrated in a case decided earlier this year called Gallagher v Crotty. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:12 am by Peter Mahler
The answer to Question #5 is “No” as established in the Pachter v Winiarsky case Frank McRoberts and I blogged about here, here, and here. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 4:27 am by Peter J. Sluka
Last year, my co-blogger Frank McRoberts offered a construction of the Business Corporation Law that gave creditors and potential creditors an alternative: a path to insert themselves (and their claims) into a contested dissolution proceeding. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 4:43 am by Peter J. Sluka
Cohen v Akabas & Cohen, 79 AD3d 460, 462 [1st Dept 2010], describes the valuation process undertaken in the event that partners wish to continue the business of the law firm after dissolution resulting from the death of a partner. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:29 am by Peter J. Sluka
 But, because even these principles have exceptions, as highlighted in Frank McRoberts’ post on the curious case of Webster v Forest Hills Care Ctr., LLC, which suggested that the right to an accounting might be absolute. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:29 am by Peter Mahler
A recent post on this site by Frank McRoberts explains the two competing strands of New York case law on tax estoppel, one strand holding tax returns are not determinative of ownership status, the other holding they are. [read post]
9 Aug 2021, 3:58 am by Peter Mahler
A recent appellate ruling by a Florida appellate court in Finlaw v Finlaw, resolving a dispute over the ownership of a partnership interest that a deceased partner devised by will to her grandson, presented an interesting twist on the same issue. [read post]
24 May 2021, 3:56 am by Peter Mahler
Common-Law Dissolution Plaintiff Loses Fight Over Venue Last year I wrote about a federal court’s first-impression decision in Busher v Barry in which it applied the Burford abstention doctrine to dismiss, without prejudice to refiling in state court, the minority shareholders’ claim for common-law dissolution. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 8:06 am by Joel R. Brandes
In re H (A Minor) (Abduction: Rights of Custody), [2000] 2 A.C. 291, 1999 WL 1319095 (appeal taken from Eng.); see Fawcett v. [read post]