Search for: "MEADOWS v. STATE" Results 81 - 100 of 428
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2019, 3:04 pm by Sever | Storey
  Condemnation for Private Developments In 2005, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled on a case called Kelo v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 4:36 pm by Matt Keenan
In People v O'Neal, the defendant fired at a van that he believed contained rival gang members. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 4:36 pm by Matt Keenan
In People v O'Neal, the defendant fired at a van that he believed contained rival gang members. [read post]
19 May 2015, 10:41 am by Matt Keenan
In State of Florida v Jardine, police used a drug-sniffing dog on a homeowner’s porch to uncover marijuana plants. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 10:01 am by Richard G. Grant
The three VLB Homes are: (i) Alfredo Gonzalez Texas State Veterans Home (“Alfredo Gonzalez”), located in McAllen, Texas; (ii) Ambrosio Guillen Texas State Veterans Home (“Ambrosio Guillen”), located in El Paso, Texas; and (iii) Lamun Lusk Sanchez Texas State Veterans Home (“Lamun Lusk Sanchez”), located in Big Spring, Texas. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 3:44 pm by Matt Keenan
Supreme Court has stated that while the contents of your phone conversation might be private, the numbers that you dialed are not. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 10:50 am by Matt Keenan
A recent Illinois appellate decision, People v Teper, however, allowed the state to prosecute a woman who received emergency aid during an overdose. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 2:13 pm by Matt Keenan
In People v Relerford, the appellate court objected to the “reasonable person” language used in the statutes. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 10:50 am by Matt Keenan
A recent Illinois appellate decision, People v Teper, however, allowed the state to prosecute a woman who received emergency aid during an overdose. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 7:23 pm by Matt Keenan
Therefore, the state failed to “purge the taint of an illegal arrest,” and defendant’s statements could not be used. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 3:44 pm by Matt Keenan
Supreme Court has stated that while the contents of your phone conversation might be private, the numbers that you dialed are not. [read post]