Search for: "MENDEZ V. STATE"
Results 201 - 220
of 286
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2007, 5:04 pm
For the reasons stated below, we AFFIRM. 07a0312p.06 2007/08/13 USA v. [read post]
29 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
” However, employees of a political subdivision of the State are not within the ambit of §80-a of the Civil Service Law which applies only to the suspension or demotion of employees of the State as the employer upon the abolition or reduction of State positions in the non-competitive class. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 6:00 am
A week ago today, I sat in the gallery of the United States Supreme Court with twenty North Carolina district court judges listening to Chief Justice John Roberts announce the court’s opinion in Endrow v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:24 am
State v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 7:05 am
” Most recently, in Mendez v. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:48 am
No. 195]), in which the Vice Chancellor adheres to the New York State court rulings. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 6:07 am
Mendez, who said he had submitted a formal inquiry about the soldier’s treatment to the State Department. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 7:56 pm
In Davis v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:38 am
The leading case on this point: Roulett v Town of Hempstead Civil Service Commission, 40 AD2d 611. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 2:30 pm
The case, Brummer v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 5:00 pm
No surprise after United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 5:53 am
Ibid.; see also Wilkinson v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 4:39 am
Ironicallythis case too ended up in Civil Court.David v. [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 12:50 pm
Mendez 16-369 Issues: (1) Whether the U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:01 pm
See, e.g., State v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 12:28 pm
Case returned for evidentiary hearing on the rule 3 because (everyone now) the record does not conclusively refute the allegations in the petition.And Judge Marissa Tinkler Mendez re-joins the wall of shame in Palomares v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 3:13 pm
Nov. 5, 2020) and Mendez v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:25 am
Mendez we see the rara avis. [read post]
23 Jul 2016, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court affirmed, holding that Rossignol failed to demonstrate that, under the governing statutory standard, he was entitled to disability retirement benefits.Group prayer while on dutyMarrero-Mendez v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
The seminal case in New York State regarding standards of fairness is the Pell decision [Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222]. [read post]
