Search for: "MENDEZ V. STATE"
Results 141 - 160
of 289
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2015, 9:30 pm
New from Michigan State University Press: The Pursuit of Racial and Ethnic Equality in American Public Schools: Mendez, Brown, and Beyond (Dec. 2014), edited by Kristi L. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:56 am
In Mendez, Jr. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 5:33 am
") AC36791 - State v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Urofsky“We always tell our children they are Americans”: Mendez v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 4:13 pm
" The case of People v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 4:13 pm
" The case of People v. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 2:20 pm
State v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 11:17 am
Ever since the FDA decided that discretion was the better part of valor – or read the handwriting on the wall – and decided not to appeal United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
In Marrero-Mendez v. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
In Bond v Lichtenstein (pdf), decided July 15, 2014, Justice Mendez granted a mother summary judgment in lieu of complaint under C.P.L.R. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 10:58 am
., United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
”One exception to the general rule: In Mendez v Valenti, 101 AD2d 612 the Appellate Division held that as long as the termination of a probationer appointed to a position in the classified service is effected within a reasonable time after the end of his or her maximum period of probation, such as set to coincide with the end of the next payroll period, he or she does not attain tenure by estoppel or acquisition notwithstanding his or her continuation on the payroll. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Such was the case in Mallon v Parness, 167 A.D.2d 614. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 8:35 am
In Valdez v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 12:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:12 pm
” Méndez v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 11:38 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:18 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:32 am
The case is Scenic America, Inc, Plaintiff,. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 2:27 pm
” United States v. [read post]
