Search for: "METROPOLITAN R CO v. CHURCH" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2020, 11:42 pm by Josh Blackman
San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority] A few moments ago, I blogged about South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
21 Jul 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
In two recent speeches she said that Leave.EU co-founder Arron Banks was offered money by the Russian Government and had lied about his relationship with the regime. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
But, by the end of the 1800s, this rationale lost currency, and by 1917 (in Bowman v Secular Society [1917] AC 406), the House of Lords held that blasphemy protected the religious sensitivities of the individual; but the courts still confined the scope of the offence to the established Church (this was confirmed as recently as 1991 in R v Chief Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Choudhury [1991] 1 QB 429). [read post]
One of the most contentious cases of the Supreme Court’s term has been Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:23 pm
Georgia judgment and the Ilascu and others v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 3:14 pm
 Second, MIPPA exempts the value of life insurance policies and certain “in-kind” support and maintenance (i.e., assistance from a family member or church) from the definition of income for the purpose of the LIS asset requirements. [read post]