Search for: "MILLS v. STATE" Results 81 - 100 of 2,058
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2021, 8:26 am
  One has seen how that is now being developed using the mechanisms of private law in OECD Specific Instance applications against enterprises ealleged to have breached their responsibility (markets driven private law based) and to that extent extra legal as a function of domestic legal orders) through acts of complicity in fragile states, conflict zones, or in cooperating with states whose own views of human rights ans sustainability are incompatible with those of the home… [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 7:42 am by Howard Iken
May God save the United States of America, the state of Florida, and this honorable court. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
At the same time, he was putting pressure on the state’s Secretary of State and on the U.S. [read post]
22 Aug 2021, 11:07 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
A recent Divisional Court decision in Morningstar v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:40 pm by Michael Douglas
See too Re Bakhshiyeva v Sberbank of Russia [2019] Bus LR 1130 (CA); [2018] EWCA 2802. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Activists are exasperated that members of Congress and President Biden have not been able to push through federal legislation that would supersede the voting laws moving through state Legislatures across the country. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am by Michael Douglas
There were three consequences of this removal: first, Fortnite could not be downloaded to an Apple device; secondly, previously installed iOS versions of Fortnite could not be updated; and, thirdly, Apple device users could not play against players who had the latest version of Fortnite.[22] 4         The Proceedings On the same day as Apple removed Fortnite from the App Store, Epic commenced antitrust proceedings in the United States District Court… [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 6:17 am by Joseph D. Kearney
The Parens Patriae Model In 1892, in Illinois Central Railroad Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
(Mills v Stanway Coaches Ltd [1940] 2 K.B. 334) Such legally fictional characters are normally deployed as part of a process of determining liability after the event, based on ascertained facts involving known individuals, tested and argued through the adversarial court process. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Noting that the statute provides that "[a]mounts payable under this subdivision shall be determined by the Commissioner of Education" and, citing citing Matter of Davis v Mills, 98 NY2d 120, the Appellate Division further explained that "[i]t is for the Commissioner [of Education] in the first instance, and not for the courts, to establish and apply criteria" regarding the propriety and administration of recoupment of alleged funding overpayments. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" Noting that the statute provides that "[a]mounts payable under this subdivision shall be determined by the Commissioner of Education" and, citing citing Matter of Davis v Mills, 98 NY2d 120, the Appellate Division further explained that "[i]t is for the Commissioner [of Education] in the first instance, and not for the courts, to establish and apply criteria" regarding the propriety and administration of recoupment of alleged funding overpayments. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 7:46 am by Eric Goldman
Facebook, Namecheap and GoDaddy win a Section 230 dismissal of a defamation claim. * State v. [read post]