Search for: "MISSOURI K. & T. R. CO. v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 Obviously, if we’re calling California conservative and Idaho liberal, then the issues associated with comment k don’t fit well into the usual legal cubby holes.Idaho, then – holding our noses all the way. [read post]
” One can still read the Missouri statute, plausibly, to make his behavior a crime.In a 2009 case, United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:30 am by Kevin Kaufman
Table of Contents State Individual Income Tax Structures Map: Top Marginal State Income Tax Rates Table: 2023 State Individual Income Tax Rates and Brackets Notable 2023 State Individual Income Tax Changes Historical State Individual Income Tax Rates and Brackets, 2015-2023 Individual income taxes are a major source of state government revenue, accounting for 40 percent of state tax collections. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  Here’s how they work together:Comment b following §908 further states that “[r]eckless indifference to the rights of others and conscious action in deliberate disregard of them (see §500) may provide the necessary state of mind to justify punitive damages. [read post]
20 Sep 2020, 12:50 pm by Tobias Lutzi
In Honda Motor Co v Oberg (512 U.S. 415 (1994)), for instance, Ginsburg dissented from the Court’s decision that an amendment to the Oregon Constitution that prevented review of a punitive-damage award violated the Due Process Clause of the federal Constitution, referring to other protections against excessive punitive-damage awards in Oregon law. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
 As the Ohio Supreme Court stated in Arbino:[R]egulation of punitive damages is discretionary and that states may regulate and limit them as a matter of law without violating the right to a trial by jury. . . . [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
 As the Ohio Supreme Court stated in Arbino:[R]egulation of punitive damages is discretionary and that states may regulate and limit them as a matter of law without violating the right to a trial by jury. . . . [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in… [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
MacKinnon (Michigan), Maria T. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
Neither, says the judge in patent and trade mark case Schutz (UK) Ltd v Werit UK; Schutz UK Ltd, Schutz GmbH & Co KgAA v Delta Containers Ltd (PatLit) EWHC: RIM v Visto: Mr Justice Arnold takes charge (PatLit) Banking brand values plummet (IAM)   United States   US General  Judd Gregg to be nominated as Secretary of Commerce (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Chicago… [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 10:36 pm
Making a Decision at the Dairy Case, Farmers’ Market, or on the Farm As described in Part 1, there is considerable variation from state-to-state in the way raw dairy products are regulated in the US. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]