Search for: "MITTS v. STATE" Results 1 - 20 of 192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 am by sally
Finanzamt Düsseldorf-Mitte v Ibero Tours GmbH (Case C-300/12); [2014] WLR (D) 8 ‘Under the provisions of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the member states relating to turnover taxes—common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, the principles laid down by the Court of Justice in Elida Gibbs v Customs and Excise Comrs (Case C-317/94) [1997] QB 499 concerning the… [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:43 am by Lovechilde
Answers: (a) Groucho; (b) Mitt; (c) Mitt; (d) Groucho; (e) Mitt; (f) Groucho; (g) Mitt; (h) Groucho; (i) Mitt; (j) Groucho; (k) Groucho; (l) Mitt; (m) Mitt; (n) Groucho; (o) Groucho; (p) Mitt; (q) Mitt; (r) Groucho; (s) Mitt; (t) Groucho; (u) Groucho; (v) Mitt Groucho [read post]
2 May 2011, 10:35 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) The timeline:1) September 2010, Judge Merritt, joined by Judge Martin, authors Mitts v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 12:05 pm
The State Bar of California may not yet be aware of Mitts’s behavior. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 8:13 am
On August 7, 2007, ABC news reports:Throughout his bid for the GOP's 2008 presidential nod, Mitt Romney has called for overturning Roe v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 3:06 pm by Christine Dowling
Mitts reversed the Sixth Circuit and rejected an Ohio death row inmate's challenge to "virtually the same" penalty phase jury instructions considered and upheld last term in Smith v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 12:15 pm by John Elwood
United States, 10-8532, for Reynolds v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 6:15 am by Mandelman
  What the American people want is an economy that doesn’t feel like the United States of Quicksand.  [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 11:30 pm
Turkey's ruling party challenged in Constitutional Court over secularism disputes.9. 9th Circuit interprets RFRA in Navajo Nation v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]