Search for: "MODJESKA SIGN v. Berle"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2009, 12:32 pm
The court stated the general rule in determining the reasonableness of an amortization period holding that: "[w]hether an amortization period is reasonable is a question which must be answered in light of the facts of each particular case" (Modjeska Sign Studios v Berle, 43 NY2d 468, 479-480, appeal dismissed 439 US 809). [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 12:32 pm
The court stated the general rule in determining the reasonableness of an amortization period holding that: "[w]hether an amortization period is reasonable is a question which must be answered in light of the facts of each particular case" (Modjeska Sign Studios v Berle, 43 NY2d 468, 479-480, appeal dismissed 439 US 809). [read post]
