Search for: "MURRAY v. UNITED STATES" Results 201 - 220 of 628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Dec 2019, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: At ReligiousLiberty.TV, Michael Peabody notes that “[t]he Solicitor General … has recommended that the United States Supreme Court agree to consider [Patterson v. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 3:59 am by Edith Roberts
At Reason (via How Appealing), Damon Root looks at the federal government’s cert petition in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
  It is intended to complement our United States: Monthly Round Up posts. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Supreme Court’s decision in Puerto Rico v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The United States Department of Justice has decided that the company will not face charges. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 10:14 pm
On June 18 and 25, 2008, the California Supreme Court granted the requests and agreed to decide the questions in both cases: Murray v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:48 pm by Mary Whisner
")The State of Abortion LawsAn Overview of Abortion Laws, Guttmacher Inst. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 7:37 am
John Paul Murray, plaintiff's architect, observed displacement of brick masonry units and opined that there was an "imminent risk that the wall would completely collapse. [read post]
21 May 2009, 7:31 am
In this connection, they contended that the applicant had been assisted by a lawyer before both the Izmir State Security Court and the Court of Cassation. # The applicant maintained his allegations. # The Court reiterates that Article 6 § 3 (c) may be relevant at the stage of the preliminary investigation in so far as the fairness of the trial is likely to be seriously prejudiced by an initial failure to comply with its provisions (see John Murray v. the… [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm by Mark Walsh
Kirtz, while Justice Sonia Sotomayor goes on a little longer on Murray v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
Am struck nonetheless by the majority's apparent treatment of the statement by John Marshall, Chief Justice of the United States, in Murray v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 5:30 am
"[T]he State sought to prove Barton's knowing possession of child pornography via the testimony of Special Agent Ben Murray of the United States Secret Service, a forensic computer analyst. [read post]