Search for: "MacAndrews & Forbes v. Revlon, Inc."
Results 41 - 57
of 57
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2008, 6:07 pm
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986). [read post]
31 Jan 2015, 7:39 pm
ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 9:03 am
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc., 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986). [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:46 am
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc. 506 A.2d 173 (Del. 1986)). [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 12:26 pm
Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, where the court stated, The duty of the board had thus changed from the preservation of Revlon as a corporate entity to the maximization of the company’s value at a sale for the stockholders’ benefit. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 7:42 pm
See Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 11:38 pm
(Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 4:07 pm
., Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 8:46 am
See, e.g., Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 9:05 am
MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc. [read post]
25 May 2011, 10:39 am
In this Revlon Inc. v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 4:21 pm
’”). [6] In Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:35 pm
When faced with non-exculpated duty of loyalty claims, Delaware courts will accept a less-than-optimal shop process as long as the directors did not act with a “conscious disregard” of their duty under Revlon, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:50 am
Under Canadian law, a formal Revlon-style auction is not always necessary for a target board to satisfy its fiduciary duties in a change of control context. [read post]
15 May 2008, 8:07 pm
Consider, for example, the proposed sale of Netsmart Technologies, Inc. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am
The Hill: “Businesses have a responsibility, too,” said Obama in his weekly address on Saturday. [read post]
