Search for: "MacDonald v. MacDonald" Results 101 - 120 of 541
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2013, 7:24 am by Maya Angenot
The Federal Court relied on Simpson Strong-Tie Co. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:38 am
MacDonald), 162 N.H. at 66, 27 A.3d 813.The defendant argues that `[t]here is a long line of cases’ beginning with State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:37 am
MacDonald to remind him of the obvious,” Saunders wrote. [read post]
10 Dec 2012, 3:37 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
In its recent decision in the case of Alexander v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 3:09 pm by Michel-Adrien
" Reaction to the 2017 Federal Court decision includes:Court Decision a Big Win for Creators and Publishers (Access Copyright, July 12, 2017)Ignoring the Supreme Court: Federal Court Judge Hands Access Copyright Fair Dealing Victory (blog post by Michael Geist, University of Ottawa, July 13, 2017) Access Copyright v York University (Fair Dealing in Education blog, July 13, 2017)Access Copyright v. [read post]
3 Aug 2014, 7:34 am by David Smith
It also means that cases such as Lower Street Properties v Jones, Church Commissioners v Meya, and MacDonald v Fernandez will become much less relevant in a lot of cases. [read post]
11 Aug 2006, 6:53 am
MacDonald Watson Waste Oil Co., 933 F.2d 35 (1st Cir. 1991) and United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division held that the Board “had a rational basis and was not arbitrary and capricious, citing NYC Dept. of Sanitation v MacDonald, 87 NY2d 650.Although the Association had argued that its grievance alleged an "inequitable application" of the parties' contracts, thereby satisfying the contractual definition of an arbitrable grievance," the Appellate Division rejected that Association's argument concerning the relationship between the… [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division held that the Board “had a rational basis and was not arbitrary and capricious, citing NYC Dept. of Sanitation v MacDonald, 87 NY2d 650.Although the Association had argued that its grievance alleged an "inequitable application" of the parties' contracts, thereby satisfying the contractual definition of an arbitrable grievance," the Appellate Division rejected that Association's argument concerning the relationship between the… [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 2:12 pm
Self Defence and Duress Defence Self Defence More than 20 years ago the Supreme Court of Canada ruled in R. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:50 pm
Reed held that field test results cannot be introduced as evidence in chief of defendant's intoxication also similar to the rulings in the cases of People v MacDonald and People v Wright. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 8:01 am by Andy
I imagine it matters to interior designers, and quite probably to Dids Macdonald and ACID too. [read post]