Search for: "MacDonald v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 55
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2023, 4:00 am
The Supreme Court of Canada summarized the applicable principle (from the 1990 decision in MacDonald Estate v Martin) in its 2013 decision in CN Railway v McKercher as follows: A lawyer cannot act in a matter where he may use confidential information obtained from a former or current client to the detriment of that client. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 5:00 am
Notably, in Valentino, the Pennsylvania Superior Court did not even reference the dicta from Archibald v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am
In 1961, the Supreme Court made clear in Monroe v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The test is set out in RJR — MacDonald Inc. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 7:49 pm
More recently, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released a decision in Barker v. [read post]
2 Aug 2020, 5:56 pm
He was exercising a Superior Court judge’s jurisdiction to control the court’s processes and nothing more. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:17 am
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal and student-at-law, Editor, First Reference In Stress-Crete Limited v Harriman, 2019 ONSC 2773 (“Stress-Crete”), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (“the Court”) partially granted an injunction to an employer against its former employee, upholding two out of three restrictive covenants present in the parties’ employment contract. [read post]
16 Mar 2019, 3:54 pm
Chutter 2008 BCCA 507 and MacDonald v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 6:16 am
MacDonald, 2000 NSCA 60. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 5:50 am
” Superior Court Judge Trevor Stephens said, “Ms. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:18 am
Superior Recharge Sys. [read post]
11 May 2017, 11:45 am
MacDonald, Reminger Co. [read post]
10 May 2017, 1:29 pm
Superior Court (1962) 57 Cal.2d 450, 455-456 [decisions of the California Supreme Court are binding upon and must be followed by all the state courts of California].). [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 7:31 am
Something of a formula may now be discerned: If you want to enforce a clause, rely on decisions like MacDonald v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:22 am
A Superior Court judge denied the anti-SLAPP motions, citing the SJC's earlier decisions in Kobrin v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:22 am
A Superior Court judge denied the anti-SLAPP motions, citing the SJC's earlier decisions in Kobrin v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:38 am
MacDonald), 162 N.H. 64, 66, 27 A.3d 813 (New Hampshire Supreme Court 2011); see Sup. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
The Court quoted a previous Superior Court decision that held "[a]n insured intends an injury if he desired to cause the consequences of his act or if he acted knowing that such consequences were substantially certain to result. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 6:55 am
In three decisions, the Ontario Court of Appeal has held that a review of a decision interpreting a standard form contract involves a question of law, not a question of mixed fact and law: MacDonald v. [read post]
