Search for: "MacE v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 52
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2021, 4:20 am by SHG
Chauvin pulled a can of mace from his belt — a sign that he felt he was in danger. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 1:51 am by Peter Mahler
Mace v Tunick The analysis got more complicated in the wake of the Appellate Division, Second Department’s 2017 decision in the Mace v Tunick case that I wrote about here and here. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 7:33 am by John Rubin
PJC counts as conviction under statute defining conviction as including adjudication of guilt Mace v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 10:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Mace is, in fact, legal in all 50 states, and the Court sees no reason why mace would not also be constitutionally protected.] [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:31 am by Peter Mahler
They also argued that the complaint’s allegations of oppressive conduct by the siblings, while relevant under the statute governing judicial dissolution of a closely held corporation, have no application under § 702 as per cases such as Doyle v Icon and Matter of Kassab. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
Which is why last summer’s decision by the Appellate Division, Second Department in Mace v Tunick was such an eye opener. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 3:03 am by Peter Mahler
This year’s list includes seven noteworthy appellate decisions, two of which — Mace v Tunick and Shapiro v Ettenson — are poised to have major impact on future operating agreements and business divorce cases involving LLCs. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 4:29 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” Harkening back to the same court’s holding two months earlier in Mace v Tunick, 153 AD 689, 2017 NY Slip Op 06170 (2d Dept Aug. 16, 2017), written about here, the court noted that the stated purpose of the LLC was “to purchase and sell residential and commercial real estate,” yet there was no allegation in the petition that the management of the LLC was unwilling or unable to achieve this purpose. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm by Wolfgang Demino
In late 2013, WPR, on behalf of its client NCO, filed suits in Illinois state court seeking repayment of student debt owed by Marquez, Garriga, and Russell. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 12:03 pm
JOHN V GROSS JR ET AL, ATTY NO COUNSEL, PRO SE ET AL STATE OF TEXAS, ATTY HUNT, DANIEL vs. [read post]